![](https://feddit.de/pictrs/image/a4e1281a-e0f0-4713-b81c-0d70610e5d0e.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
What’s the argument here? That because you drive twice as far, it is expected you run over twice as many people?
Linksgrün-versifft, vegan und nerdy in Berlin. Fan von Vogelbildern.
What’s the argument here? That because you drive twice as far, it is expected you run over twice as many people?
Not really. The research papers mention an interaction between an antibody and a gene that controls tooth growth in both humans and mice. If that gene is supressed, there is no tooth growth.
However, every tooth you can ever grow, or at least the embryonal tissue for it, is already present at birth. There is no way to get more, and activating this gene would not give you additional tissue to develop into new teeth.
But ist that not part of it? Being put in situations where you don’t have all the information, where you don’t know the potential outcomes and where you can permanently fuck things up? For me at least, that was a big part of the pull in playing TRPGs and CRPGs. It is, after all, not a strategy game.
As someone who never used an immutable distro: what are the quirks when using it?