As a terrorist they could torture and kill him without covering anything up.
As a terrorist they could torture and kill him without covering anything up.
He didn’t leak, he published.
That’s what’s so concerning about the case. The USA tried to persecute an Australian citizen working out of the EU for publishing information.
If precedent was set they could kidnap anyone from sovereign countries based on US law
This comment seems contentious. Are the differences in opinion political? An ideological opposition?
.
Thank you for your comment, it provided more context than the article
I agree our media is incredibly controlled.
However, this summer didn’t feel different, it got to 45C as normal in Perth, the heatwaves did not feel longer or worse.
Maybe we’re frogs in water but I’d say such an article would not engage the public
How much was WeWork valued at without turning a profit?
I found a .com domain helps with this. You can find some ugly ones for cheap
I cannot think of a use-case outside of statecraft. Maybe companies engaged, or being engaged, in corporate espionage.
Libreoffice calc does not have the functionality Excel does.
I got real excited to learn the physics of a nuclear gravity bomb.
We have gotten to the point in modernity where so many bombs are technologically guided we must define bombs which fall, and are guided by, the force of gravity.
This also ignores the growing middle class in China and India. Countries will have to be quality of life competitive or they will experience brain drain to the west.
Agreed, my bad
The 1967 amendment already did that. But yes, the campaigns were about the voice, not recognition of first nations people
The title is hugely misrepresenting the referendum.
Not even our conservative party, the liberals, opposed recognition of aboriginal and Torres islander people as the traditional owners of the land.
The neo liberal progressive party, labor, put in a change to political process. This is what people disagreed with.
deleted by creator
As this doesn’t interfere with mining interests or criticism of the government the AFP will be sleeping through any antisemitic sentiment
Gotta love media wording.
Both a prisoners of war, many are civilians on both sides. But one group have prisoners and the other have hostages.
I like praising bots and I won’t be stopping
They should investigate, sure. However, the true test is in the court’s. A ruling supporting that Momika’s demonstration is in protest and does not preditorally target a religious group would be of benefit to future activists.
What is with the down votes? What are you disagreeing with?
I don’t trust the source, but why downvote without comment?
That’s what’s so concerning about the case. The USA tried to persecute an Australian citizen working out of the EU for publishing information.
As he is not a US citizen he was not able to use the X amendment to free speech.