What the hell kind of crap is that writing?
Also, I’m surprised this is even this a thing, I thought he’d abandoned the boring company years ago.
What the hell kind of crap is that writing?
Also, I’m surprised this is even this a thing, I thought he’d abandoned the boring company years ago.
Well they inherited a market that was golden for the Boomers and GenX
Sadly, those two groups, instead of continuing to fight for workers rights like generations before them, grandfathered their rights into contracts in exchange for sacrificing our rights.
I’m sure there are zero side effects from loading up clouds with salt crystals.
Like, salt water rain, for example. Given that what we put up into clouds comes back eventually, usually as rain.
It’s a core problem with image generator LLMs. For some fucking reason they seem to have fed them the content from sites that had a lot of porn. Guessing Imgur and Deviantart.
Literally the first time I tried to use MS’s image generator, was out with some friends trying a new fried chicken place and we were discussing fake tinder profiles.
So I thought to try it and make a fake image of “woman senuously eating fried chicken”.
Content warning, blah blah blah.
Try “Man sensuously eating fried chicken”. Works fine.
We were all mystified by that. I went back a few days later to play around. Tried seeing what it didn’t like. Tried generating “woman relaxing at park”.
Again, content warning. Switch to a man, no problem. Eventually got it to generate with “woman enjoying sunset in a park.” Got a very dark image, because it generated a completely nude woman T-posing in the dark.
So, with that in hand I went back and started specifying “fully clothed” for a prompt involving the word “woman”. All of a sudden all of the prompts worked. They fed the bot so much porn that it defaulted women to being nude.
A camp of concentration, if you will.
It was a work issue about a decade ago. Client wanted certain emails from automation to be masked as coming from him.
Most email boxes, including Gmail, didn’t have an issue. Outlook(the one that shipped with Office) laughed at it and displayed the original sender in giant bold letters.
Yay, does this mean that Google is going to stop saying the masked email address is the sender and hide the true email address?
You know, like MS has done for over 15 years now?
Oh yeah, its his party, he’s just the face.
It’s the offshoot of the same party that led Albert Einstein to distance himself from the concept of Israel back in the late 1940s.
Also, allegedly that most of the reason Hamas got to execute their October 7th plot in the first place was that Bibi had all of those soldiers off intimidating the judges that were overseeing his multiple criminal trials
You realize that Netenyahu and his fascist Likud party are the ones responsible for eliminating democracy in Israel?
Until he faces consequences for this, there is no downside to him.
And the longer it takes for there to be consequences, the better it is for him when they happen, as it is increasingly attributed to him “being right” to his cult.
For Canadians, Environment Canada has a fantastic app called WeatherCan that includes all of the usuals, has doppler radar for all of North America with the option for a one or three hour loop.
It also includes alerts from Environment Canada for any location you’ve added and links to the marine weather forecast site.
Before that they have to figure who actually owns the ship. Which may or may not be easy.
Didn’t say they couldn’t afford them. They didn’t want to pay that expense
If you think for a second they’re actually doing anything to these people, I have the deed to a bridge in Baltimore I want to sell you
Cats are subtle gestures.
E.g. their slow blink thing conveys so much information. How fast you do it, how long you hold it, the tilt of your head. It all ties into the message.
Time to make and market a package of 30,000 10 frame long 100 pixel x 100 pixel random videos.
You’re building beautiful straw men. They’re lies, but great job.
I said originally that we need to improve the interpretation of the model by AI, not just have even bigger models that will invariably have the same flaw as they do now.
Deterministic reliability is the end goal of that.
It’s an exaggeration, but its not far off given that Google literally has all of the web parsed at least once a day.
Reddit just sold off AI harvesting rights on all of its content to Google.
The problem is no longer model size. The problem is interpretation.
You can ask almost everyone on earth a simple deterministic math problem and you’ll get the right answer almost all of the time because they understand the principles behind it.
Until you can show deterministic understanding in AI, you have a glorified chat bot.
Will increasing the model actually help? Right now we’re dealing with LLMs that literally have the entire internet as a model. It is difficult to increase that.
Making a better way to process said model would be a much more substantive achievement. So that when particular details are needed it’s not just random chance that it gets it right.
Yeah and it unfortunately succeeded, so I’m surprised it is still around.