LOL the comments telling the Verge to shut it’s mouth.

Also man France loves piracy. I apparently need to learn French better.

And you have to be a jerk apparently.

You immediately assumed people needed to have multiple pieces of hardware when some can’t even afford past what their job provides, being able to have a separate and dedicated machine is still privileged.

You got immediately defensive and felt you had to rush to defend the dangerous question because you thought I might have been snarky when asking? What the hell?!

And you are still doing it!

Being rude is asking you to explain why we should have a second device running Linux?

And you wonder why there is an adoption problem with that OS.

No but if you need a windows machine for work then what is the purpose of having a second device running Linux? Like actually.

My point still stands. The topic sure is about Linux and windows 10/11 but I still stand by,
“why have a second device I won’t use, on second hardware I had to buy, that I can’t use cause it doesn’t run my apps optimally?”

Cause that just sounds like I should own one so I can say I have a Linux device for you guys.

You said we should own a non powerful personal Linux machine but didn’t give a reason why? Why should we have an extra device running Linux if we already have the needed windows. Downvote me sure but give logic not personal desires

Right ok… But what’s on the other PC for the linux OS? And why should we bother having another one on a different OS assuming we can afford extra hardware?

The end goal seems to be to get everyone to have a Linux PC still even if people can’t use it effectively.

Edit for clarity I don’t get the purpose of the second PC running Linux if you already have the main work PC running windows cause you need it.

You know what’s shocking? I did. I ruined my desktop trying to set it up with some web server functions and wiping it somehow got rid of the license.

And so I paid to get rid of the watermark… boo!

There you go one last scary story for the season.

Your solution is

“Just fix it”

Which puts a lot of just making it someone else’s problem with no plan of your own.

No situation has been fixed without making so much noise or issues that it becomes another person’s problem with power. If the solution was just people going out and fixing it then the world would be very different than it is now.

But it sure is easy to just be stepped back and making a claim for other people to figure out.

Sex has reasons to exist and your issues with it are your own. It’s not just about them being not always about romance but about the characters when done right. They are not just about showing love in romance movies.

You bring absolutely nothing to an argument other than your own sense of correct and force others to bring forward their points so you can ignore them. It’s, as always, a waste to reply to you.

LOL I love the camera man hiding in the corner cause he can’t leave but wants to give them some privacy if they are having a moment.

Yeah I think that anxiety is the reason people don’t want to see it.

The study also shows that they want escapism and fantasy stories that are only happy more than ever as well.
Ignoring the harsh bits is the point and the anxiety of the topic of Sex itself is I think the key factor in it being taboo because people want to ignore that which makes them uncomfortable.

Yeah a lot of people proclaimimg from their own soapbox of limited perspective that sex is pointless and gratuitous when there are so many stories that don’t work.

We literally have stories that revolve around sex as its own topic like Nymphomaniac Last Tango in Paris that don’t work without sex. But someone got the ick watching Titanic so now apparently all sex scenes are derivative.

Poor Things I watched in an AMC, fuck off with that.

You provided no examples and I provided multiple that are big films that played for massive audiences that sex is used for multiple reasons and not singulary one and gratuitous.

I am not going to list 20 films cause you would deny them just as easily from your place of predetermined correctness.

Sex should not be a myth that people are scared of and hiding it behind the extra that happens after true love does no help for the people who are now going to be afraid or perfectionists about a normal human experience.

I don’t like bad writing as a sell point but sex in stories is not that most of the time. The things trying to sell themselves on shock will turn to other aspects just fine. Look at the romance movie that ended with 9/11 instead of a sex scene for that.

I also think bathroom use can absolutely be included in a story if it works and is important to the story which sex as an intimate act with multiple characters usually is.

I just don’t think pushing a side of less sex should be talked about is a good side to suggest as equally valid as it does not help anyone but those that want it to be a controlling force and act.

No you are speaking from a specific point.

Poor things had lots of sex, not about love or romance.

Teeth, is rape.

Even Pretty Woman has a sex scene that is about the lust of the main character with no kissing to show it.
There are plenty of examples to prove you wrong as much as you have examples of your point.

You are the one saying it cause you are making a broad statement from your perspective ignoring all that doesn’t fit into it. It doesnt make you right to selectively pick your examples because it’s the ones you think of and have a problem with you try to apply to the rest of it.

It’s a thing that happens and kinda has to happen. there will always be a story that needs to include at least the mention of it.

What does your affliction have to do with movies and TV for others?

Teens,

They want to believe in a world that isn’t terrible.
Want to have perfect friends they don’t have.
Want social media to be real life.

We are in the era of make believe and roleplay and we wonder why nothing is getting done in the real world.

Sorry but someone still has to have sex out there to give birth to more asexual people.

Right? That’s my thought. We already have a record low of sex scenes in media but people are still complaining about it?

It’s then not about the use but some other social issue, like say social stigmas against sex by a growing authoritarian right while being an act that is performed less and less by younger people on all sides say maybe by fears of the biological outcomes of unprotected sex?

I think it’s just stress at the thought and an avoidance tactic.

What if it’s not about love? Sex can be about many things and for the sake of the story.

Saying it only happens as the result of a perfect romance story is puritan and not beneficial to demystifying sex as an act that humans do.