Very uncivil of you. You are part of the majority here, nothing important or intelligent to add, just ad hominems. Lemme is a trash heap.

Was that an attempt at Pig latin? Cuz you did it wrong.

God help me… I wanna make fun of you. You removed my comment for “incivility.” Arg. Nvm. Thanks, lemme gestapo.

Lol. It’s the topping on my cake

That’s for the invite, but no thanks. Don’t even know what comment you’re referring to.

Lolololol… I’m 100% American you r tard. Yeah I know pig latin.

… I used comprehension in direct response to your use of comprehension.

I’m about to just stop responding to everyone. I feel this is a losing battle…

Pointing them out is one thing. Complaining about them is another. And no, I wasn’t complaining about them.

I didn’t comment about you being nice or not. I commented about how utterly insufferable you seem to be. The reading comprehension is very low here…

How’d you know I wasn’t American?

Let me stop you for clarification. Is your attitude this reprehensible and insufferable in real life? Or just online?

Translation: You’re a dumb ass

Edit: sorry… y’all’ve sapped my energy with idiocy.

Ok. Thanks for your opinion.

Well, everyone can and should come to their own conclusion. One thing…

articles about Trump losing have a much stronger Central bias.

It’s about 1/3 central 2/3 left. I think that is a good way to look at that.

Haha I wanna find the depth limit of your m… ! I’m jk. Just trying to help reach the thread limit.

You’ve been wasting a lot of time/energy replying here

Hah you’re not wrong about that. I’m nearly worn out now.

I haven’t answered those topics for a few reasons. Some are more nuanced/complicated and require more effort, and like you said, I’ve “been wasting a lot of time/energy replaying” already. But no, they aren’t “minor quibbles” and totally worth arguing, but I have enough on my plate already.

IT IS A COMPREHENSION ISSUE BECAUSE WHAT YOU WROTE IS INCOMPREHENSIBLE.

I’m just about done… yall are wearing me out.

Lol, nice. Add making assumptions to that list now.

Got any more?

I can play this game…

Perhaps, but you are clearly thinking and writing like one.

That’s an opinion. You sound politically color blind. If praise isn’t being solely given to the candidate you support, sutely, he must be for the opposition.

“those of us who live in reality”

I’m not so sure you do. Trump said some of THE most inane things he’s ever said, yet you are effectively equating that to what Harris had said, which had more substance in a few words than Trump had in the whole debate.

Way to take that quote out of context and then argue something else. This is the whole sentence:

I know everyone here thinks it was a big Harris win and no one denies it, so I’m just here to tell inform yall that “those of us who live in reality” don’t consider it a big win for Harris or that Trump did badly.

I wasnt talking about the substance here. It was commentary about how it is being claimed that it was a “big loss for Trump” and/or a “major win for harris,” which it was neither. People who actually interact with other people “in the real world” have a better understanding of how people actually perceived the debate.

Right out of the Fox News talking-point playbook. And the proper spelling would be “whiny”. Unless you’re comparing her sound to a horse’s neigh.

Is it? I don’t ever watch Fox, so I wouldn’t know. Assuming and generalizing, not a good strategy.

Right out of the Fox News talking-point playbook.

Lol. Again, even. And even if it is, it’s not wrong. This place is a liberal echo chamber. The sooner you’re able to understand/accept this, the better off you will be overall.

Who said I can? Yours is incoherent and disjointed. Reading slower doesn’t help.

1. It’s not an argument. It’s me explaining a simple phrase. 2. Yes, the phrase does hold up in a vacuum. 3. Why would we consider it in a vacuum?

And then… you say

Brought into the context that Trump said

So… you aren’t putting it in a vacuum, you are putting it in the context of something 8 years ago. (Relevancy here is a stretch)…

your argument is utter bullshit.

My argument…? What was my argument?