Lucia [she/her]

  • 0 Posts
  • 30 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 17th, 2023

help-circle
  • the norm is that the users block the individuals and instances they want no part of?

    “Yeah, just block every bigot in existance and you will achieve a somewhat good experience”

    Spammers also exist, and they can go long ways to avoid blocking by e.g. creating many accounts. There are people out there who could do this just to troll and harass a single user. If you’re fine with blocking every piece of shit there are - good for you. But it doesn’t mean it should be a norm.





  • Basically, you don’t want everything be dependant on a central authority - this is a single point of failure. If there’s a big security vulnerability in your web browser, but you use a standalone mail client, your mails are most probably safe.

    This also adds up to built-in adblocker - who knows if Vivaldi devs will ever go evil and sneak in exceptions in their adblocker? Or if they will sell their web browser, just like their CEO done so with his previous browser, Opera.


  • Also OP post is about privacy not bloat

    OP is concerned about Pocket integration too, so I assumed they may not like it.

    these features will only improve your privacy over using some webmail.

    Does their built-in mail support any good encryption? The last time I used Vivaldi a mail feature wasn’t really that private. Also, using dedicated email client like claws or mutt is even better from privacy perspective.

    All google stuff is either removed or toggleable from settings.

    They can’t remove Manifest V3 though.

    What’s wrong with that? It’s a good deal larger than mozilla’s

    Yes, and it’s under Google’s control. And, again when I used it last time, you need to enable some google stuff to install extensions from the store.




  • Fluxbox or IceWM as a more standard, familiar floating WMs (both are pretty customizable too).

    WindowMaker is my goto for standalone window managers, it’s look based on NeXTSTeP OS from 90s, so it doesn’t look like yet another ripoff from windows or macos (both are ugly IMHO), so it’s pretty unique.

    If you want minimal and keyboard-oriented, cwm is THE wm for you. The main problem is that default keyboard shortcuts are really bad (openbsd fanatics will say otherways, but when shortcuts are spread around ctrl+, alt+, and ctrl+alt+, it’s really far from good), so I recommend tweak them or to find someone’s config.

    If you want a desktop-agnostic file manager for these wms, I’d recommend xfe - it’s somewhat obscure for some reason, but it’s really, really good. Can’t recommend more.

    As to install, all of these should be in your distro’s repo. Fluxbox may come as two packages (fluxbox2 and fluxbox3), the first one is the last official version and the second is the “community edition” - a fork, basically.

    At least on Void Window Maker package is called WindowMaker, with capitalisation. Since Void sticks to official naming, other distros may have the same name.

    edit: Also, it’s worth to mention most of recommendation on this thread are tiling window managers (awesomewm, i3, hyprland, etc.)






  • Lucia [she/her]@eviltoast.orgtoLinux@lemmy.mlSystemD
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It may speed up your boot time, at least it happened to me on Void (maybe the reason is how minimal this distro is though). I personally prefer runit over systemd in how it handles services, but honestly you most probably won’t notice a much difference - definetely not worth reinstalling whole system.