![](https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/72ca0686-b4e4-42ab-9799-8b0d63cc1d11.webp)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
I suppose you could say I’m making a good-faith assumption. It’s possible that he is.
my point is still valid.
I suppose you could say I’m making a good-faith assumption. It’s possible that he is.
my point is still valid.
that’s not exactly what’s in dispute— the prodcut that LLMs produce. That would probably be ruled as a derivative work under the DMCA’s “Fair Use” clause, and, therefore, public domain.
the issue at hand is that the company accessed the copyrighted material without paying for it and is now using that training to earn more money without fair compensation.
these language models or even proper AI can’t create original creative works the way a human can. The best it can do it create a pastiche or composition that simulates originality but is really just a jumble of recycled ideas that it’s been trained on. There’s a fair argument to be made that the owners of the copyrights of those pesos works are entitled to fair compensation, especially since AI is a tool used by a company to churn out profit off the work of others.
If you then use your brain to reproduce a product based on copyrighted work owned by Warner (without their permission) and try to sell it, then you could be in violation of the law.
the thing is: AI and your brain are very different things
deleted by creator
I’m convinced there are stronger terms by which they can go fuck themselves, and I’m determined to find them. 
Jones said. "The lack of political leadership on the right to denounce these threats — which serve to inspire real-world political violence— is shameful.”
this is the worst part, the most disingenuous garbage, and what makes fighting agains this even harder.
REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP WANTS AND SUPPORTS THIS
the sooner we all acknowledge this and treat Republicans - collectively - as the FASCIST THREAT that they are, we all will lose.
deleted by creator
I noticed that. the fascists really hate local news holding them accountable for being shitty people, so they railroad them out of business.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
he’s trying to Trump his way out of this, but after Dolt 45 just caught 14 more charges of “your’e fucked” today in Georgia (for a total of NINETY-TWO* charges across 4 state and federal indictments), perhaps that’s not such a great strategy.
*In New York, he faces 34 felony counts in connection with hush money payments to a porn star. In Florida, he faces 40 felony counts for hoarding classified documents and impeding efforts to retrieve them. In Washington, D.C., he faces four felony counts for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
like all bullies, he’s a coward
I might have gone back to read it, but the mods took it down. maybe you should take a hint.
I’m not reading that, lmao
oh, right… racism is our fault. because we complained about it. gotcha. that’s some real DARVO bs ya got there…
“DARVO is an acronym used to describe a common strategy of abusers. The abuser will: Deny the abuse ever took place, then Attack the victim for attempting to hold the abuser accountable; then they will lie and claim that they, the abuser, are the real victim in the situation, thus Reversing the Victim and Offender.”
sorry that you totally missed the point of the video.
And no I’m not advocating for tolerance of the intolerant
that’s exactly what you’re advocating for when you say shit like this:
I just don’t believe we should make a big deal about a couple of idiots comments
because that’s not what this is at all
only admins can block an entire instance.
there’s one or two mobile apps that do it, but, currently, most people use the web interface.
edit: kbin users have other options, apparently (see below)
but it’s irrelevant.
none of this is relevant in copyright law. the only thing that matters is who published it first and who is then using that copyrighted work for profit without first having gotten permission of the owner.
also irrelevant
laws are not written with the idea of whether on they’re hard or easy to prove as a consideration. also, your claims of such things being easy/hard to prove is a matter of opinion, and I don’t agree with you chain of deduction here. OpenAI admitted that Rowlong’s works (among many others) were used for training chatGPT.
also irrelevant, unless you’re arguing that, because it’s too difficult for small artists to defend their copyrighted work, they should just shut up and deal with it. currently, there is no legal precedent as to whether this is or is not copyright infringement, which is what a lawsuit like this is intended to set. For most, I would say, it Eem that it clearly is, for others, it’s not so clear.