data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9596e/9596eed4a70ce3dfb55dc4a0e405eab1be932f8d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2f93/f2f939022ffae29e4decb326a98f4493d0a2e13e" alt=""
Maybe if you stopped putting the license in your comments, people would discuss the issues with you?
Maybe if you stopped putting the license in your comments, people would discuss the issues with you?
It’s super cringey and does nothing.
You agreed to the ToS given by the library.
Hence why you have to get a library card to check out a book.
That license does nothing.
Your comments aren’t licensed because you put something in them. It’s stopping nothing. Licensing is an agreement, and requires parties to consent. You don’t just magically force licenses onto people.
If this was real I could license my comments where if you read them, you owe me 10k.
This is the digital equivalent of sovereign citizens.
They might report you to a credit agency or keep your deposit
Yeah, a lot of the cobol jobs aren’t high paying.
There are definitely some, but those are usually emergency hires and not long term…
It should be separated.
AI generated code is usually boilerplate and tools like copilot, cursor, etc are huge productivity uplifts.
Like them or not, they are here to stay. A lot of code written by developers isn’t unique or novel.
AI generated code is useful.
I strongly dislike AI slop and I hate ai being shoved everywhere, but I’m also a realist. I use AI code everyday in my job because my job doesn’t pay me to have principaled stands, they pay me to deliver features.