I’m not ok with those things obviously, but I don’t know enough about them to say what I think is all, I’m just talking about the “technical” aspect and that at a base level I think that the effort to make a more anonymous service is respectable, though I would have never used a service like this personally. Of course that also implies that anything passing through it should be harder to track and moderate, for good and bad
I think that what I was talking about is exactly why they say what they say, for people that want to have more privacy/antonymy it’s there to tell them that the system itself is inherently limited so they can’t expect to be completely safe and the provider can do whatever they want or need to do by law (and here it seems from what they say, if it is 100% true, that they have been trying not to comply for the users’ sake) when you rely on their service.
About the non-refundability, it’s true, though it’s not any more suspicious than the service in itself trying what they can to keep the users’ anonymity, so it is at least coherent, I guess it’s really up to how much you trust them there, you know what you’re getting into after all
Not to mention I don’t know why anyone would use a provider that was happy to warn people they aren’t trustworthy.
That’s the most honest statement, because that’s email by nature. If you don’t encrypt anything yourself with PGP, emails will be readable by the server and there is no way around it, some providers have automatic encryption between users of the same provider (e.g. Proton) but that’s most likely less than 1% of your email traffic, unless you really use it to chat (for which there are much better suited tools already), most the others will be on their popular service that doesn’t do encryption at rest, let alone in transit (and I mean one where they don’t hold the keys) and, if you want to contact them, you either put up with the fact that your conversation is exposed or you convince them to set up PGP
Damn i- дами іт!
Eh ehm- before that, I’d encourage you to remove the words from your comment, I have patented writing
Oh ok, gotta try that, but does that mean that this only works while maintaining the PC on?
How did you do it? For example if I keep some apps open and reboot it should reopen them at startup, right? I tried that and it didn’t work, but maybe I configured something wrong
Me too, there are a lot of bug fixes here though. Anyways, has that ever worked for anyone?
Clearly some edge lord…
I see what you did there
Fair lol, it was welcome anyway
I think you responded to the wrong comment, I didn’t question the need for uv or other tools like that
Appimage doesn’t do deduplication where possible like Flatpak does, where did you get the idea that Flatpak packages are bigger?
This! Haven’t used that one personally, but seeing how good ruff is I bet it’s darn amazing, next best thing that I used has been PDM and Poetry, because Python’s first party tooling has always been lackluster, no cohesive way to define a project and actually work it until relatively recently
100% I can imagine they don’t want to rely on third parties to develop their distribution, but, realistically, all the software that keeps the system going will be developed by “randos on the internet” still, so might as well hand over all the development effort to who has the knowledge already, while providing funds/grants
Didn’t know that one, looks rad
Hell yeah, SuperTuxKart
Good luck! It can get complicated so I know how you feel looking at weird configurations that do magic
Putting one directly under the home directory feels like a psychopathic move, so I stay by XDG and put them under a subdirectory of xdg-documents
Me waiting for tagging filesystems to become the standard
And 1st tastiest