So you have to fiddle with the volume less on vinyl?
That’s the one good selling point I’ve heard for vinyl so far.
So you have to fiddle with the volume less on vinyl?
That’s the one good selling point I’ve heard for vinyl so far.
I vastly prefer non-optimal life to not existing at all.
How could you possibly know that? Do you remember not existing?
That user base is a drop in the ocean compared to most of reddits user base, and those people have all left already.
The comparison in this case is operating on the word half, not on the subject of the sentence:
Only half want to get married, even less [than half] want kids.
This is a contributor post, not a Forbes official article.
I read here recently that the rich people who pay attention to Forbes for investment information avoid all Forbes contributor content and focus only official article from Forbes staff.
I don’t know how true that is, but if you believe it then until a forbes staffer writes about it in an official capacity, it hasn’t actually hit Forbes.
No, Newtonian physics works just fine. Unless things are too big, too small, too fast, or too slow.
At least that’s what a meme I once saw said.
Before tablets, parents didn’t survive.
The target being the executives who will approve the marketer’s work.
So what are they doing that illegal that other apps aren’t doing?
Removed by mod
So what are they doing that illegal that other apps aren’t doing??
I really don’t know how to be any more clear with this question.
I read the article too, and those things you quoted sound to me like things every app does.
Hence my question: what is different here?
There’s not a word in this article about why this breach of privacy matters while others do not. It’s not stated whether this was in the terms of service for the app, and whether those terms were ruled against.
All kinds of apps have been selling personal information for a long time, and it’s been ruled before that it’s allowed if they have the proper legalese in the terms of service. Did this app just not have any terms of service?
Why is it a breach of privacy for this app, but other apps doing the same selling of personal data is not?
You forgot the part where we all return to poverty so the rich can stay rich in the face of climate change.
Easy fix: don’t offer support
More expensive easy fix: contract with a call center in India to do “support” for you.
Personally, I do. But I doubt any company gives a shit what my standards are.
It almost as if education and critical thinking about what one is reading is important.
That book can be read to children in the context of it being wrong. It can be explained to children why it is wrong and that just because they read something in a book doesn’t mean it’s right.
What’s better, educating people to think critically, or banning things so they don’t have to think at all?
Libraries are public institutions, book stores are not.
Public institutions must play by the rules of the people, private companies are only bound by the rules of the law.
He’s rich, that’s how.
That’s some solid reframing, bro 👍