It was not a ‘silly demand’. It was an implied argument:

Your statement was either a claim that can be substantiated and should be otherwise it is a personal attack for which you should be banned for 3 days in this world you live in where “I feel seen” is considered uncivil.

But, I think you knew this which is why you, by your own admission, immediately scrambled for an excuse to ban me by examining my history in hopes anything was there so you could press what you think is an ‘I win’ button. Sadly, by abusing your mod powers all you do is hurt Lemmy and the fact you did the exact same thing less than an hour later to someone else you weren’t arguing in good faith with tells me this is a serious problem that I doubt is going to get fixed.

So, enjoy your own personal 4Chan for however long it lasts but know you lost the argument when you couldn’t resort to anything but an unstubstantiated ad hominem and had to hide behind false authority to cover it up.

Yeah, something doesn’t add up. Even if all 17000 employees were paid $400k/year (I’d be shocked if this were the case) that would be ~1/3 this amount. I smell BS.

So much this to the point that the title pisses me off for supporting the idea that share price is the appropriate metric for a 'turnaround '.

All I said was that you did not read it further.

A claim. Substantiate it.

Yes, vague nonsensical statements are going to work. The abstract says nothing along the lines of what you appear to suggest it is.

You are the one not here in good faith. You’ve yet to substantiate a claim, and are obviously only here to defend your agenda, and not the science

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

“Testosterone is the primary male hormone responsible for regulating sex differentiation, producing male sex characteristics, spermatogenesis, and fertility”

“Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm)”

Edit: So basically every biologist on the planet that understands basic mammalian anatomy.

It means I want to move to Australia

Starting to see why him and Trump got along so well.

Are you seriously arguing having a name known to the public is not an individual feature?

You’re wording it poorly. They downgrade factuality due to sounding left or right, not the absence of being centrist. Centrism is itself a bias which is why it is on a scale and not called neutral.

Removed by mod

As a perfect example, your obvious bias strongly influences readers evaluation of your opinion. Guess what mine is.

The opinion section reveals the bias of the author and if that author writes news articles, guess what, that bias transfers. Ones biases do not simply vanish on a whim.

One of the reasons journalists (are supposed to) minimize bias is because if they tell one side of a story by definition they omit information from the other side.

Not 1 man. A team of volunteers and contractors. I challenge you to find competitors doing a better job.

Calling for “radical solutions” is a very poor choice of words atm.

Removed by mod

The definition stands with an express exception due to pathology. The exception that proves the rule.

Show me a scientist that doesn’t agree. Good luck when blood test paperwork literally declares the range for males.

Edit: Some related reading for you while you search

Bias Rating