![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
One of them does it a lot more than the other too
One of them does it a lot more than the other too
Claiming that they only targeted fighters while the whole world can see they’re killing civilians … hmm … seems to be the standard PR response in that region.
Even if they do, the actual title is just a click away.
And I agree that it would make things less convenient, but honestly I absolutely hate news articles on social media because the algorithms literally mostly show you what they know you’ll find controversial. I believe that’s had a giant role with the radicalization of people over the last several years. So if it’s inconvenient, good! People shouldn’t really be getting their news from social media anyway.
Lowers the incentive for using outlandish, misleading headlines.
Forces people to click the link and go to the news outlets’ websites thereby giving local news better ad revenue.
Increases chances of people actually reading the article instead of making assumptions based on misleading titles.
Maybe I’m missing something but this seems like a good thing to me.
Well shoot, I actually like that. Never thought I’d see the day.
That requires at least a mediocre amount of critical thinking skills and those are taboo in religious organizations, so doubt it.
Of course the 19 day old account is jumping to conclusions. That’s what it was created for in the first place.