![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
He’s not a billionaire, unless you count all his debts.
He’s not a billionaire, unless you count all his debts.
Got any examples of a man getting away with something like this?
Yes but you see the companies he defrauded are big and he is small.
Oh I thought you were talking about their FISA warrant canary which has also gone away because of course the feds are snooping on Google accounts.
Yea for liberal news every gun is an AR-15 and for conservative news every brown person is MS-13. Both are really dumb.
Buy cheap shit, get shit results.
Bruh just press/hold the pairing button on your speaker.
I had toast for breakfast.
What the heck does complying with wiretap orders have to do with removing YouTube videos about adblockers?
Yea, that was a good editorial choice on your part. I did pick up on your scare quotes, I just thought it would be good to tack on the additional info “below the fold” because it’s just baffling to me that 20 years later the majority of people still think they’re hackerman when they make WiFi “hidden”.
It’s absolutely mind-boggling that the existing WiFi infrastructure on the military ship didn’t trigger any alarms. This is the kind of thing that you can get from “pro-sumer” grade hardware/software like Ubiquiti, let alone corporate-grade or military-grade stuff. The feature is called “Rogue Access Point Detection” and it’s built into literally every WiFi solution on the market. Like, your local library is analyzing this stuff it’s that basic.
Edit: To more directly address your point, the name shouldn’t matter at all. Rogue AP detection doesn’t give a shit about the display names of things, it looks at the actual hardware addresses and compares them to known things that are owned by your network.
Maybe they mean dupe as in duplicate, as in doubling the value of their bank account.
Hidden WiFi networks are not actually hidden in the literal sense. They still broadcast beacons that your wifi chip will see as basically “hidden network beacon lives here”. Your network connect interface just decides not to show you a list with a bunch of useless “(hidden)” entries you can’t do anything with.
Also, when a new client wants to connect to the hidden network, the first thing it does is broadcast an unencrypted message saying “HEY, I’M LOOKING FOR [hidden network name]” so it’s completely trivial to unveil the name of hidden networks given enough time.
I use discord to keep up with what my friends are doing, look at pictures that they post, etc. We used to use Facebook for the same thing back when it was The Facebook and required a university email address and didn’t have ads. How is that not social media?
Because it was never a problem.
But you literally started this thread because it’s a problem. And then you spent more time defending your bad choice on a Lemmy discussion than you will ever save in your entire life decompressing PNGs.
It’s not always about profit, it’s also about controlling the narrative. The more expensive that is, the less the narrative can be controlled by money.
After VAR the ruling has been overturned.
Instructions unclear, moved to Alberta and I’m surrounded by Trump flags and austerity measures.
Oh interesting, I guess I had the name attribution backwards!
Checkmate!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denmark,_New_York
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denmark,_Iowa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denmark,_South_Carolina