So you are literally unwilling to see it any other way - because that would require admitting Trump lies to you

Lmao. I dont know what s your fixation on him but I never talk about him. It has nothing to do with the subject matter. All I will say on the subject is I’m glad he s the president on the sole fact he seem to piss you a lot.

About your article can’t read a paywall and while it morphed litteraly mean change in something else like it wasn’t the original subject. Tell me what he said when he goes back online. And keep watching him he s so talented and a net plus for society

i applaud your dedication. you give a true sens to words like keyboard warrior. but im gonna be honest, what i call a 1 u call it a 2 and we simply can’t agree on fondamental point. for me he lied and that s it, youe explanation are excuse and that s it. Your self importance and preachy attitude telling me i can’t think for myself is simple uncheck ego. Cause yeah any free thinker that are smart enough will conclude as you, cause on any subject the issue of disagreement is always because of ppl being lesser than other. Since you couldnt admit he was simple and plain lying i had fun reading what you send but that becamme ridicoullous the faact u seem to belive you right on any point. so im just gonna debunk your false accusation of your last post and we gonna see what your boy gonna say when he comme back on tv, cause u watch him right ? you didnt do all of this for not watching him ?

i didnt lied about Patel, i repost info as they were i didnt lied about politician needing to tell the truth, you seem to forget that what you cite is about a particular contexte that doesnt apply H24 7/7 about the shooter being leftits you are dishonest and u know it. u dont shoot a right wing commentator with casing where it s written cath that facist plus telling it was against hate and your own familly telling you were under leftist influence to dismiss everything cause now u find authority that are worth your trust cause they said something that please you but all the other where wrong.

i simply enjoying the fact that’s your gonna watch jimmy your boy and i wont even impose that at gantanamo. have fun having somebody that did black face and harass women on national tv as your idol. you make my day.

we have the heroes we desserve and yours are one that use violence against somebody that peacefully debate others without hate or violence and the other is preachy asshole that s the most corporate bland of tv that like i said did black face and harrass women on national tv. But i know your moral compass is it s all square if they agree with you

i hade fun watching this :https://youtu.be/uLTeMC81FV0 but i will have more fun knowing you watched jimmy kiemel rofl

That dishonest. It s like me saying 1+1 = 3 and I’m right without telling any of my conception or what is the context of it

I dont have to answer tour question cause it s not the subject and one wrong doesn’t make it right in the both sens. Your rebuttal of what is litteraly a lie specially when he s given the opportunity to explain himself further and to just walk back a false stetament is hypocritical. Tell me what he said when he come back on broadcast

Nop, He s responsible his words and if the most common interpretation isnt what he mean he s still responsible for it. Nobody for him to say that. Your logical approach is to dismiss the most logical one

Killer kill because of political disagreement. Isnt link with opposing political position… Yeah that must be that specially when related to the shooter said he was deeply invested into the political opposition of the victim.

Like if a nazi killed a proheminent left figure and didn’t talk about his plan and your reactions would be like yeah no link between his idea and action. Right

You are the one being bad faith saying his formulation in no way or form can be interpreted other way than yours.

Fair enough. Still not an attack on freedom of speech

The point is to support the author or the publisher ?

Damn bro his right to lye in 4k on the air on the most controversial recent issue is being suppressed by the government ? Omg Better call Alex Jones and anti vaxer to tell them they were unjustly juged and should defend their first amendement right

Here you go

https://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/guides/hoaxes

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2024-title47-vol4/pdf/CFR-2024-title47-vol4-sec73-1217.pdf

You should mb get in contact with the gouvernement that vote this law

He still lied and your word soup doesnt change that fact. I dont even know why you search a parallel wich isnt one and isnt related to that case.

The contract she signed has clauses that she must respect and can justify its cancellation. This is very classic.

About the fact that the rule isn’t apply fairly accros the board I tend to agree but the other case aren’t that similar tbh

30 sec of google search https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250794666/cuckoo/

Mostly agree with your point except it was still a public account. About 4 I haven’t seen any instance that would proove they dont apply the rule accords the board. Also she s a contractor and as so she signed a contract with clause and thoses clause allow them to finish the contract.

You good at just derailing the conversation on things that doesn’t matter regarding that issue.

The first amendement regard personal right not the right about tv national network and still it s a private corporation that fire him not the gouvernement

So good, finnaly disney will have to drop their activist productions and start making great content again.

Ok bro then go see Kimmel to say to him that your going to represent him in front of the court of law for unjustified termination regarding his freedom of speech

We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it,

Nice try taking part of sentence out of context. His formulation let no place to doubt.

Somebody killing a maga adjacent or affiliate personality and your reaction is saying Isnt it weird how thoses ppl think the shooter isnt maga is dishonest in all context. I’m glad that u dont feel that s the case but that s doesn’t matter in this one.

Also if it was really his freedom of speech under attack it wouldn’t have been only the fcc that would be in the case. You rip what you sow and making the attempt to paint a bad comedian as a martyr of freedom of speech while he still can express himself simply not on broadcast that have stricter rule is also dishonest.

Private company have a right regarding public statement by their employee.