![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
3·
9 months agoIt could be account information from partnerships e.g. bundles, old customers, subsidiary companies, or something else entirely.
Your guess is as good as mine.
It could be account information from partnerships e.g. bundles, old customers, subsidiary companies, or something else entirely.
Your guess is as good as mine.
Basically this data included customer details on 36 million customers, and Xfinity only has 32 million active customers…
They’ve already admitted it includes all plaintext customer details (names, address, last 4 SSN, etc.), and their password hashes, but no info on what hashing function was used to make them, or if they were salted.
This is just what they’ve admitted. Who wants to place bets on whether they also got all the customer data that shouldn’t be legal to collect, but is e.g. browsing habits, traffic analysis, user/household metadata?
The article doesn’t make it appear like they are asking for, or suggesting, drug law reform. They’re only advocating that the police treat investigations into pop-culture artists with more care…?
Maybe that’s just Variety’s spin on it, but that’s what the article makes it appear like.
Can anyone with more knowledge, or who speaks Korean, clarify if that’s accurate?