![](https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/6b31ffe6-d10d-446b-8491-b866f8a65c98.webp)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/045a2049-eb61-4960-88ba-97e7f1ffbf31.jpeg)
Yeah, I get that - it’s downright silly in a lot of ways, but I found that fun myself. If looking for Robocop-type things, you did see this, right? It’s a pretty good shooter, and the anti-corp tone is straight out of the first movie.
I coalesce the vapors of human experience into a viable and meaningful comprehension.…
Yeah, I get that - it’s downright silly in a lot of ways, but I found that fun myself. If looking for Robocop-type things, you did see this, right? It’s a pretty good shooter, and the anti-corp tone is straight out of the first movie.
I mean it objectively didn’t look like any Fallout game, it certainly didn’t play like any Fallout game, and it was space opera not post-apocalyptic. But please explain to me exactly how it’s just like Fallout? And which Fallout exactly?
They said “From the Creators of Fallout and Fallout: New Vegas” which is true because it was Tim Cain and Leonard Boyarsky. That doesn’t mean the game is going to be FNV. Every interview they gave, they were clear about it. But a bunch of people saw the word “Fallout” and immediately stopped listening to anything else.
Wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the studios’ requirement - every big streamer I know of requires certain platforms for HD and higher streams because of the copy protection required.
Panned mainly by folks who expected “Fallout in Space” in terms of open-world and modding, but it was smaller in scope and great in writing and tone. Would recommend watching Tim Cain’s YT channel for the vids about it. The main valid criticism was that it was too easy, but I really enjoyed it.
Um, I never said it did. I said this doctor released the information to “own the libs” because he’s an asshat.
The worst part is that these weren’t even his patients - he just decided to share their private medical records to own the libs
The big difference is that all those exceptions only apply to an authorized party, i.e. a health care provider authorized to care for the patient. In this case, the doctor in question was never authorized - none of the patients were in his care.
You seem very confident in your answer, but the actual text doesn’t seem to match your assertions?
https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/breach-notification/index.html
There are three exceptions to the definition of “breach.” The first exception applies to the unintentional acquisition, access, or use of protected health information by a workforce member or person acting under the authority of a covered entity or business associate, if such acquisition, access, or use was made in good faith and within the scope of authority. The second exception applies to the inadvertent disclosure of protected health information by a person authorized to access protected health information at a covered entity or business associate to another person authorized to access protected health information at the covered entity or business associate, or organized health care arrangement in which the covered entity participates. In both cases, the information cannot be further used or disclosed in a manner not permitted by the Privacy Rule. The final exception applies if the covered entity or business associate has a good faith belief that the unauthorized person to whom the impermissible disclosure was made, would not have been able to retain the information.
No one seems to be reading the article - it was a survey of only 2,000 participants on a financial advice website. These folks have already made poor decisions and likely not experienced in managing their money. The usual FUD that the OP posts everywhere.
Wasn’t it in Early Access before? I think this is about it coming out of Early Access?
Wow - while I sympathize with their goals, this represents a fundamental misunderstanding of how the Internet works. They need to restrict and govern corporate entities, not the Internet itself.
As far as the decision behind the policy goes, the game’s community manager said on the game’s official Discord server that it was a Sony decision, not Arrowhead
https://insider-gaming.com/helldivers-2-ceo-apologizes-for-psn-account-requirement/
This is definitely the work of Sony, not the developer. There is no motivation for the developer to require PSN signups for the game and all the motivation in the world for Sony. In addition, anything dealing with how the game is distributed is solely within the purview of the publisher- the developer almost never has any say in what happens in that case.
That’s because there’s nothing he can do - this was Sony’s decision as the publisher and the developers can’t do squat about it unfortunately
From a strictly moralistic framework, unless Putin has attacked you personally, it is in cold blood. We can discuss a global societal morality and what would be justified under that, but sadly the global community has let Putin be Putin for decades now, so globally at least, it could be argued that current power structures value the status quo over what risk may be inherent in going after Putin. The kind of mindset you seem to be displaying is essentially just a complicated vigilante.
The issue seems to be that you are confusing your personal moral framework with some objective moral framework that you have yet to define.
Would I be absolutely happy to push a button that sent a meteor hurdling through the atmosphere until it sandwiched Putin between itself and the ground? Yep. But I won’t pretend that it’s some “extremely moral” decision.
I absolutely hate Putin. But yes, killing in cold blood is indeed murder. If he attacks me personally, self defense is of course morally justified in the minds of many, but killing him before he can by brought before the international courts is assassination and killing him afterwards would still be murder.
Under which morality is murder okay? Punishment is an understandable instinct but not as helpful as treatment/rehabilitation/etc. and it never works as a deterrent or “correction” of antisocial behavior. “Extremely moral” seems to be a bit of a reach for “state sponsored murder”.
Just curious as why not Portal 2? That’s honestly one of my “chicken soup” comfort food games - Portal 1 is great but to me, Portal 2 is so much more.
That’s like saying Cyberpunk 2077 looks like Fallout.