deleted by creator
This type of advertising isn’t new. There is that famous (although the claims from the father have been questioned) New York Times article written by Charles Duhigg in 2012. A father of a teenage girl in Minnesota got upset for receiving coupons from Target for infant care related products. As the story goes, he later learned his daughter was in fact pregnant. It turns out Target was using some predictive algorithm to identify would-be mothers and straight up sending them coupons for infant care products. It seems ever since this article was published that they stopped doing this in such a direct manner. Again, there have people who questioned the validity of the claims for this specific story, but Target did confirm they were doing this.
The video states the names are pseudonymous. So the answer would be, no.
I’m sure they looked at Indian government and figured since they routinely discriminate the Muslim population he was in the clear.
First of all:
You should never take a polygraph test.
Let me tell you, as someone who isn’t getting news from television or the formerly awesome Breaking News (a digital news aggregator that was bought by NBC and later shutdown in 2016), things are bad when you hear about a mass shooting a day after it occurs. This shouldn’t be happening but it should be the worst thing making headlines. The fact it got drown out by President Dumbberfuckle Trumperdickle isn’t good.
Tell that to The Doctor! /s
Look Starbucks owes Peet’s everything. That company started off buying from Peet’s.
It’s a Bay Area company. They aren’t all over the U.S. According to a map on their website there are 286. Approximately 47.5% are located in the Bay Area.
Well they have been caught multiple times buying from slave labor farms in Brazil, buying from a farm with child labor in Guatemala and possibly contributing to the decline of commodity prices in 2019 (which was under a $1).
Does he know what a recession is? Genuinely asking. That would help understand this response.
But that isn’t a Meta company.
And there is a big chance those of us clearly not on there can’t see them post about that denial.
deleted by creator
Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you: the person hired to fire themselves.
I go by my middle name. Not because I wanted to, but because that is what my immediate family chose. I became comfortable with it. So I decided in certain settings to let people use my first name.
99% of my extended family doesn’t know my first name. Some of them are teachers. If I had been in their class, they’d be in trouble. Fucking stupid law.
Well I grew up having a crush on Moss from The West Wing but, no, not gonna watch it.
You linked the same article from the post.