After that tell Trump he hasn’t been sworn in yet.
After that tell Trump he hasn’t been sworn in yet.
He’s not even hiding it.
In January, Stewart received a commendation from the department for responding to “issues related to the houseless population” with “compassion and professionalism toward everyone.” As the Courier Journal first reported, Stewart is facing a 20-day unpaid suspension for helping to cover up a subordinate’s use of force against a man likely experiencing homelessness last year — a suspension he is now appealing.
What the fuck? They praised the dude for racking up citations. Look, if one person is getting a majority of the citations, clearly the system is flawed to some degree. But they later found he was covering an incident against a homeless person. Talk about flip-flopping.
Is Trump doing anything legal at this point? I genuinely want to know if his existence is a walking case of law breaking.
I’m sorry, but repeating the words associated with an actual murder, but not saying “I am going to kill you” is a bit of a stretch to claim terrorism.
Here is the definition of domestic terrorism from the FBI’s website: “Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.”
What about this incident is violent?
EDIT: Just to be clear, I am in no way defending these people. I just think the terrorism charge is overdoing it. Sure, a threat, but terrorism?
Yeah but the vice president is daughter of Rodrigo Duterte, a man who is best known for extrajudicial killings in a “war on drugs” and he didn’t even like that his daughter was running.
Oh and the president is the son of Ferdinand Marcos. His family hated by so many.
People really hate the Marcos family. When he died (which was in Honolulu, where he was being treated), the government initially didn’t allow his body to be brought to Philippines. It took four years till the next administration before his body was returned.
Right, well I forgot they claimed such.
Okay, how is this any different from what Fox News, OAN and NewsMax do?
Yeah but domestic terrorism itself (last I checked) has no criminal statute. It would be much easier if we had a law defining domestic terror and how to prosecute it.
Well, that does mention it but not that one. Two people try to sell the milk.
Maybe I’m remembering wrong, but wasn’t there a Portlandia sketch about why raw milk is bad?
Apparently being the victim of genocide gives you a free pass.
At this point, looking at this vehicle with your naked eyes is bound to cause damage.
I’m pretty sure this is in response to a recent California bill that forces digital storefronts to disclose if it is a license you are getting. Otherwise the storefront is not allowed to use words like “buy” or “purchase”.
https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/26/24254922/california-digital-purchase-disclosure-law-ab-2426
I don’t want him associating with my favorite movie. Secondly, he probably thinks the theatrical cut is the canonical one.
I assumed it was a weird reference to the Phoenix Force from X-Men.
Could they not have found a pun for fox?
Shouldn’t Church and State doctrine (or whatever it is called) immediately make all of this illegal?
And stop claiming the South China Sea as their own. Didn’t international courts rule it belonged to Philippines?