hswolf

I got the big sad on Judy’s diving quest, she goes on about how tha one corpo inundated the whole place for profits.

Or even the El’Captain quest where you need to go steal a medical truck because the corpos where poisoning his whole neighborhood real bad for years.

I can find more examples of these “small” atrocities, I think they are meant to infuriate you over time, problem by problem, and not display a big single thing you’ll hate forever

right? I’m lvl 170, 60vit and light armor (fashion)

I only die if I get pummeled down, stun locked or get hit consecutively by charged attacks

the dlc is indeed harder, but nothing unfair

That’s the problem, only switching the transportation method isn’t enough, there’s a whole infrastructure behind that needs to be built.

In most city centers you can kinda refurbish pre-existing systems, but in suburbs you need to build from scratch, and the distances are way bigger which imposes another challenge.

Don’t get me wrong, im all for it, but we need to acknowledge these problems first.

I’m all for efficient public transports in downtown, I use them daily myself, but people on suburbs won’t really see a benefit to this.

On the other hand, just switching to electric is a nice start, otherwise we won’t be able to live much longer.

let’s just host all these services for free am I right? who needs to pay energy bills anyway

The thing is what is the consensus of “runs well”? Is it a FPS constant? No glitches? Fast loads?

My point is, a game can come shitty and run a constant 30 fps under the “recommended” since that’s what they thought was appropriate

Is a gray area that should be more descriptive, not sure why downvote me

Not that I remember, true that it didn’t handle the last gen consoles, and that it was marketed as quite demanding

Sadly “minimum” or “recommended” just tells us the game runs, not that it runs well

thats was just a loud minority talking about super max setting with Raytracing and 4k

that can’t be true, it’s way too simple, there must be a catch somewhere

you’re missing out hundreds and thousands of awesome fan made content, there’s even entire fan made dlcs

There’s also few but existing examples of people that resist the selling urge, like the VLC dev

I beg to differ: Adnan Khashoggi, a famous arms dealer, considered one the richest mans of the 1980s, active on the Iran-Contra affair. Viktor Bout, famous russian arms dealer active on the FARC. Sir Basil Zaharoff, greek arms dealer active on the Balkan Wars

And these are just a few most notorious ones.

As I said, when a war starts, someone is already winning, it’s a sad but true reality.

Seems I’m getting downvoted. Just to be clear, I condemn war and armed conflicts, If i could make so, no guns would ever be fired.

My point is, it’s pointless to argue about the “should be” or “could be”, I’m just stating the actual, current state of matters.

There’s ALWAYS a winner, in fact, If a war started, someone is already winning, be It one of the involved parties, be It a guns supplier or a manufacturing plant making tanks.

It’s naive to think that, people with power to decide what to do in a war, will prioritize a “good and moral war”, over getting what they want from It.

Maybe you and I can’t see any advantage over an attack and label It stupid, but it is what it is, and maybe the actual intent is not clear to us.

Anyways, war is bad, but don’t be naive.

It’s morally wrong to do so. At the end of the day, like every single other war in the human history sadly , the right side is the winning one, be It bombing power plants, hospitals or houses.

I strongly disagree with this, web dev is great because you can serve hundreds of different devices with the same code, I can’t imagine developing native solutions to each one, yikes

yes, because the average user doesn’t even know there are different browsers, and that they can change the default one, which is great to “vendor lock” your own browser, in this case Safari from iOS

I think the problem is just that, the game is… okay, not bad or good, just okay, unremarkable and forgettable.

If you want good sales you need to do something innovative and interesting, or something cliché but really well done.

Taking a look at Doom 2016 (also a single player shooter) we can see the core gameplay: Shoot demons, Pick up ammo, Shoot more demons. But it’s crafted so masterfully that you spend dozens or hundreds of hours doing just that.

Now with this game that I actually forgot the name mid comment, It’s… well you get the ideia.

here’s a video about how most nuclear waste is handled

here’s a video about how most nuclear waste is handled

I don’t think that’s the right perspective to have on this, a good action isn’t bad just because It wasn’t the best action possible.

And the solution you brought upon, would still leave the first problem afloat, “great, we reduced plastic consumption, but who’s going to remove the plastic that is already in there?”, It’s a paradox you see? If he chooses option A, people will burn him at the stake because he didn’t choose option B.

I was skeptical at first when I first got aware of him, then I did some research and there’s a ton of philanthropy there, lots of people got some help they needed.

EVEN if it’s done with ulterior motives, the non changing fact is that people indeed were helped.

Whichever motives he has behind his persona, he has helped more people than most could or would’ve helped in their entire lifetimes.