As an FYI to myself: the leaps have not been made.

I would love to have TypeSpec enable support for examples, callbacks, and links. If it added those three, it’d be a total game changer (for me).

My position is one of always design an API first (produce the OpenAPI document of what you want to build) and get buy off from your customers/stakeholders. Then when we start coding, we know exactly what well the end result should be.

Even better would have the ability to do request/response validation via a OpenAPI spec in .NET. Still holding out on that pipe dream (I know it’s available via other languages).

Can you block these by adding Pi-Hole? I’m so tired of enshittification.

Feels weird to introduce something that’s been around for a while. I’ve been using typespec for about a year. Works well but it needs to make some leaps to match with the OpenAPI spec.

Perhaps I should see if those have been made…

If my spouse were to ask for me to do that, that would be an actual discussion in which I would seriously consider it. My partner has not asked me for such a request so I don’t consider it.

This was never something that came up as a child and I didn’t share a room in my teenage years.

Well, shit. I have this. It actually sucks.

From just this year, I can recall:

• My spouse smacking my arm when I was furiously masturbating right next to her. I woke up with my erection in my hand. I asked her if she recalled it in the morning but she didn’t even remember smacking my arm.
• My spouse informing me on two mornings last month about attempting to initiate during the night.

I can’t sleep next to anyone who doesn’t know about the condition and consents to the possibility of having to wake me to stop it. It caused friction in my early marriage (no other serious gfs) but once my spouse helped me realize what I was doing did i understand this occurred.