In India there wouldn’t even be a case for a lawsuit in the first place.
he/him
a cool (brr) dude
In India there wouldn’t even be a case for a lawsuit in the first place.
Can’t believe Xi Ping would do this
Why is Europe suddenly pretending that subsidizing critical industries is a Chinese invention?
"We were concerned from the beginning that [the apes] might be seen as discriminatory expression, but we had no intention of likening apes to humans.
That sounds like “we are sorry for insulting apes” lmao
Guilt over WW2 is a farce.
For this particular occasion, the engagement aspect is less important. The more interesting thing to look at is whether BJP pressure on Meta was the reason that these ads were given the greenlight. Twitter’s offices were raided in the past for some petty BS so it is not out of the question.
Thanks
Can I see this unprecedented misconfiguration?
Google: No
What’s a “real” ad? They use that term multiple times and I can’t imagine how it is different from a normal ad or if the adds that the start menu already had were somehow different from normal ads.
Unpaywalled link: https://archive.is/3fDEd
I hate Indian news so much.
I can guarantee you that Hindi news TV channels are by far the absolute worst in the world. My Hindu fascist boomer parents are addicted to that shit so I am exposed to them at times. I doubt the people here can imagine the level of sensationalism that is rife in them. They look and sound exactly like what parodies of them looked like 15 years ago.
The way they explain the use case of cognitive enhancements it doesn’t sound as controversial as the title implies. Unless I misunderstood it.
I hate America though
Russo and sinophobia is something I’ve sadly gotten used to seeing but this level of ghoulishness where you are straight up shilling for IMF is new to me.
Here’s how Ukraine can still win
Tests are meant to gatekeep who gets to get the field training required to become a doctor. Sending every jabroni into residency willy-nilly is probably gonna collapse the healthcare system completely.
It says as much as it does for an LLM but doctors have to have a lot of field experience after passing these tests before they get certified as doctors.
This research has been done a lot of a times but I don’t see the point of it. Exams are something I would expect LLMs, especially the higher end ones, to do well because of their nature. But it says next to nothing about how reliable the LLM as an actual doctor.
So a python can properly digest an adult human if given a time? Had no idea about this.