That’s not very patient gamer of you lol

Wherever people call out the October 7th death count that always makes me notice I can’t find data on how many Israeli civilians have died since October 7th. It’s almost like this has never actually been retaliatory.

I work in healthcare IT. EHR clients and other necessary software that hold PHI (protected/private health information) run only on Windows. Recall seems to require a PC with a discrete 40 TOPs NPU so none of the current workstations. There is an opt-out already so I’m sure, though not positive, it can be turned off with a group policy.

I, optimistically, think this is a moot point for businesses. The goal is to get consumer data to sell not lose business purchases.

Cynically, I think it will be forced on consumers with, eventually, no option to turn it off.

Our previous experiences with companies being hacked and leaking personal information on the “dark web” with little consequence to the bottom line anecdotally proves otherwise.

I feel like the headline and all these comments have WAAAAAYYYYY too much faith in the technical savvy and/or privacy concerns of the average pc user. They are not committing suicide. They know that a very small minority will be upset by recall and AI but the vast majority don’t know enough to care and definitely won’t take the time to learn about why they should care.

They didn’t dispute the “one of the richest” part

Yeah, unless they are on actual professional race cars. But the ones on commuter cars just look dumb and don’t serve a purpose.

What about if it was a reminder and warning

If he’s gonna live rent free in my head I ought to let people know right?

Correct.

Correct.

Trump is a genocideS supporter.

I forgot it wasn’t any of my business to ask. My bad

That’s the guy who sings Somebody That I Used to Know right? /s

You’re manually reviewing the entire code of every open source product you use? Manually reviewing the code at every commit of every open source software you use?

Can you cite a source for this? It is not what most people are anecdotally experiencing so you are being down voted.

Ohhh I see what you did there.

“…many EIDL loans of $100,000 or less didn’t enter into collections. Those loan amounts represented small fish, and the government didn’t have the resources to go after them…” My initial reaction was good. Then I read this and thought they are going after the wrong businesses, so not good. But then at the very end of the article it says small businesses account for 99.9% of US businesses so that must represent most of the economy and they are clearly gouging us too, so good again?

How does this get enforced though? They don’t even enforce their no call list or cut down on junk robo calls as it is.

Is this a real quote?!?!

CIDRAP - Closing It Doesn’t Reduce Airborne Poop