Cornell West then, idk.
I am a person online.
Cornell West then, idk.
That’s the thing, if the democrat’s only rivals are on their right, the only voters they need to court are the moderate right wing, they have no incentive to make any concession to the left, which they can take for granted.
If I were an American, I’d probably vote Harris if and only if I live in a swing state or a state where the margins between votes aren’t too high. In any state where the outcome seems set in stone, I’d vote a third party candidate (probably Jill Stein). They won’t get elected, but if there’s a noticeable increase in the number of votes for them, it might make democrats nervous that their political orientation choices aren’t viable. I’d also start campaigning for the third party the day after the election, regardless of the outcome.
Thank you, I’ll try. Tho I’d still be interested to by the answer to my original question, since I might want to change other keybinds later…
Okay, but the question is how would DNA differ between a Sephardic Jew who was born in Valencia and someone born in Genova from one or both parents of Sephardic Jewish background? They don’t just say he had Spanish and Jewish ancestry, they say he was born in Valencia, despite the previous most widespread theory that he was born in Genova.That’s what intrigues me.
I might be missing something here, but how would a genetic study prove where he was born? I see how it could prove Spanish and Jewish ancestry, but how does it show that he was the immigrant and not his parents? Beside, they even say he was born in Valencia… Awfully precise. And they’re quoting a documentary rather than a research paper…
And not any violence, but domestic violence! Certainly one of the right’s top 3 favourite flavours of violence.
“Please vote for me! I will do anything but stop supporting genocide of people abroad who share your religion.”
Truth is just an opinion. Whatever was said most eloquently and with more confidence was probably truer. There needn’t be any fact checking other than two people each saying a thing, the one who’s right will simply sound right to anyone, regardless of any pre-existing bias. /S
Did you think they were called that because they were hedging the hog? No, they’re hogging the hedge.
I like my humor like I like my coffee: At a baby’s face.
And they would’ve gotten away with it if it wasn’t for you meddling kid!
Saving this post in case I ever get a date.
Step one: Shake head while going “üüüühühühü” and then “plwlwlwlwh”.
Step three: Profit
There’s been scientific and philosophical debates for a long time about which cognitive traits are specific to humans and which are shared across species, and which trait is specific to each group. This is just another element to add to this debate.
If you’re wondering how this can be applied, it’s not the researcher’s job to know. A lot of the time, a discovery’s practical applications are only found decades after the discovery itself. Some are never used, but we can’t know in advance which knowledge will be useful.
So ideally, those who work in fundamental research needn’t consern themselves with the potential use of their work, they seek knowledge for itself. If there’s useful stuff in there, applied scientists and engineers will pick it up later. Ideally, but unfortunately, researchers may need to convince a patron that their research will be useful if they need private fundings, which can be a problem. Sometimes, they’ll have to put a little bullshit in their pitch for companies. But since this probably wasn’t a very expensive study, maybe public grants were enough. Or maybe they convinced some company that they could use it to promote cat antidepressants.
Because black people’s income increased, right?
You know you’ve spent too much time online when you read “Ocean Circulation” and immediately imagine a version of Renai Circulation sang by planktons and shrimps.
I assumed at first it was a satyrical journal like the Onion and read it in that optic. Then I saw the comments and thought a few people had missed the joke and were taking it seriously. Then started doubting, checked what type of paper it was and if other known ones (like nytime) also talked about it…
This is real, fellas. He really did say that.
This reads like the skript to a movie.
Five months earlier, both she and Sol had reported Torres to the US police - but say they weren’t taken seriously.
Nevermind, realistic AF.
Regardless of the result, he’ll say the numbers are fake anyway.