I’m in fact implying (not very clearly, admittedly) that Russia has had no defensive wars after 45.
pronouns: hän/hänen/häntä/hänet/hänessä/hänestä/häneen/hänellä/häneltä/hänelle/hänenä/häneksi/hänettä
I’m in fact implying (not very clearly, admittedly) that Russia has had no defensive wars after 45.
Well, I probably cannot get in there anyway so it’s a bit moot. Plus it would mean a major relocation. But yeah, I’d happily work on an Israel contract.
In a 100% offensive war. Sadly, Russia can take the loss of people, so these zergling tactics can still continue pretty far into the future.
Does this mean there are new open positions at Google?
How about blaming whoever came up with that dumb idea? Did they watch the “Homer designs a car” episode of Simpons and thought it was a good idea?
April 20. 4/20. Rriight. I wonder whose idea that was.
Read up on lemmygrad and you’ll learn that Uyghurs are being treated better than any other group of humans on this planet and west is to be blamed for everything else too.
Why not both, though? In fact, China could also send weapons to help Ukraine.
No, but it does make it not-murder.
My position is no, none, collateral murder of kids is fucking wrong no matter who does it. What the fuck is your position?
Obviously. What is the point of stating this banality, this easiest positions of them all?
Yep. Very different. End result is of course the same, but so is the end result of a fatal aneurysm.
Perhaps you misread me or the article. The sons were not underage. I mean… they had children of their own. Did IDF know the underaged grandchildren were travelling with them? I have no idea.
Murdering people vs doing something causes people to die are very different things.
Okay very cool so you endorse wiping out entire families because of one person?
Do I?
We know that our species has the ability to deteriorate circumstances so badly that violence ensues. In many cases, there’s no obvious objective single perpetrator – things just deteriorate slowly to a place where nothing sane can be done to fix it. Israel vs Palestine is an obvious example of this happening.
Realizing this fact doesn’t mean that one supports it or any of the steps that were taken to end up in that situation. I may have the opinion that I would rather see Israel win this thing, but it’s not like I think that that would be an absolutely great thing. Just a less shitty thing than any other realistic option that I can see.
I understand that this means that I indirectly support deaths of people who deserve to die, but also of people who don’t deserve to die. But now that we’re here, there’s no path in which that doesn’t happen.
Of course I have no evidence. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe you also have no evidence that they were not?
I mean if my father was the head of a rebel resistance movement, I think it would increase the odds of me being part of the same movement.
IDF seems to be claiming that the children (not grandchildren, the ones aged 10, 8 and 4) would have been Hamas military operatives. That would make sense, given their father.
In my opinion, that would make these collateral deaths, not “butchering”.
Were they soldiers of Hamas or civilians who happened to be directly related to the leader?
Removed by mod
None for otherwise.
A ceasefire may allow Hamas to regroup and survive, which would be a bad thing. Then again, from my couch it seems like IDF is not about to destroy Hamas completely with this war.
Are you trying to be funny?