A block chain is a distributed permanent ledger of transactions where any intermediary who claims to provide anonymity is in danger of being compromised and turning instantly into a Honey pot

You are both pedantic and pathetic. Yes someone in danger of losing citizenship for speaking out politically and then sent to a gulag to die doesn’t have a human right to continuity of citizenship under the law

You can’t expect to be safe running from a gunman in a lot of circumstances

In this case where it isn’t even ice you would be in the clear if you lived however if 2 armed men approach with guns drawn you not being a fictional character in a western are fucked.

Best bet would be for multiple people to obstruct and delay and get the actual cops hoping an actual gunfight is undesirables for all.

Notably the cops can locate any cell phone and mostly identify its user. There should be cops raiding this warehouse as we speak.

I don’t think you are the arbitrator of what a human right is…

Once you need a normal server you might as well just have the server you already need serve the info preferably simply by grabbing a diff from previously so you reveal no info and without downloading a substantial portion of a chain. I swear people want to shove a blockchain into shit when it almost never adds any value whatsoever. You didn’t address the fact about making an indelible link between you and your report and indeed prior reports if you are ever nabbed.

Wait where do I get my free ticket to a better country?

Sightings are tiny and compressible you could download all the sightings then diffs and never leak anything but ip or if a VPN not even that.

Why would you need the block chain here again? At that point it needs to be an app because your browser can’t consume any of that shit and you are creating an immutable record of who reported who in such a way to ensure punishment.

Why on earth do you think not being listed in a particular document makes something not a human right

There are many birthright citizens of all ages not just infants. They would instantly become homeless and destitute in a country where they may not speak the language and have no proof of citizenship even if they may eventually have some due to them eventually.

Furthermore this is a vehicle to deny them other human rights by selectively removing people who are entitled by our constitution to citizenship for speaking against the government.

Right of redress assembly speech to be secure in their person , and to be subject to the law not a ruler are all important rights herein denied.

Why would I define human rights by virtue of what a wiki says today?

He won because he can delay actually following the law until he’s dead because it will be impractical to stop him

Human rights are those required for human dignity and flourishing not those which are universally possessed in a world full of distress and toil.

Freedom of speech is one such commonly understood but often denied. For instance if the content of your speech can see someone removed from the land of their birth to one where they are stateless and homeless what other rights do they possess?

I remember the last time it was run. It’s why we got president Bloomberg. Oh wait. Why would he actually reference Bloomberg himself whilst suggesting this? Did he just forget exactly how badly this worked?

There are plenty of schools in Europe. There is no reason for essentially the equivalent of 1930s Jewish people to study in essentially Hitler’s Germany in the 30s right when the smarter people were getting out.

again shut up

shut up

You don’t have the alternative to go into other people’s country and round up people because people will absolutely shoot any such folks then drop bomb’s on your cities and forces. It’s not my fault you are confused about what the options are.