Well, we wouldn’t want them to run out I guess. /s
Well, we wouldn’t want them to run out I guess. /s
It is stupid, yes, but they wouldn’t be able to do that anyway.
I’m fairly certain that the article is using the wrong term here and the problem is that the name Skywalker is trademarked.
You wouldn’t be able to trademark the name Jane Doe so you wouldn’t be able to prevent someone from using it.
You’re right about the glowy baseball bats but I think that Jedi combat is a tough one to pull off well. You can force pull any of the lower enemies into a one shot with the light sabre as it is and there’s no reason that you shouldn’t be able to do that with all human sized enemies that aren’t force users except that it would make for a dull game.
The loot is shit but I don’t know what more a Jedi needs other than armour or blasters but they don’t really use them. It is very weird that I had to find something in a box for me to get the idea to not shave my beard so close.
Wipeout 2048 was my favourite of all time and is available in the Wipeout Omega Collection. I wouldn’t say that it’s better than the more recent titles but it was just the one that grabbed me.
I also really liked:
I think that we know the answer to that don’t we?
We’ll keep hold of them in case we need them regardless of the fact that using them now would drastically reduce the chances of us needing them later.
That’s ignoring the humane reason for sharing because that won’t be considered relevant to any decision made.
As an aside, Sanchez is missing the fact that the EV tarriffs were implemented in response to excessive state aid by the PRC. It’s not good for him to promise to drop the tarriffs without committing to more negotiation regarding the EU’s concerns about state aid.
That is a pretty huge thing to ignore too. Without the EU imposing tariffs, China could shut down the EV industry in the EU. Without tariffs, any country could shut down any industry in another country unless the other country also provides subsidies.
Well, as we provide Israel with only around 1% of their arms imports I think that we could only ever hope to make a political statement rather than having any real impact.
Same in the UK but we’ve only just done anything about it.
When I played games on my PC I ended up spending more time configuring my Steam controller than I did playing the game.
A classic example of perfect being the enemy of good.
Which means that he could also not override congress and not send Israel guns or cash.
That’s the problem isn’t it.
I’d have no problem paying for privacy respecting access to websites that I used frequently except that I don’t trust them to keep their end of the deal.
lol. We’re short of prison space so get the deal with Rwanda for immigrants changed to be criminals instead.
Yeah. It’s a pretty meaningless statistic really.
I was definitely more likely to leave the UK after the brexit referendum than before it but I’m still here. The chances before were less than 1% and the chances after were closer to 1% but probably still didn’t exceed it.
P.s. I’m not a millionaire in case anyone is wondering.
I’m like that too. I can’t think or move fast enough for RTS but don’t have the patience for really thinking things through in turn based games.
Maybe the in between would be turn based with a time limit per turn.
Every week or two there’s a new ceasefire deal on the table and then Netanyahu says something to the tune of “but we’re not stopping until Hamas is gone”.
It seems that the negotiators don’t have the authority to negotiate for anything other than “you stop shooting now and we’ll stop shooting when you’re dead”.
It’s mostly in a spoiler tag and is intended for it to give you only the conclusion and you’d need to click through to get to the detail.
It doesn’t work on my client though.
Oh, so it’s bad for Russian trolls and hackers to interfere in elections but it’s okay for Indian priests?
/s
I think that it’s the red arrow that does it. So much scarier than a green one.
/s
There is a red line. The west keeps saying over and over again that they must defend themselves within international law.
The problem is that they either ignore the red line or deny that it was ever crossed.