There was - it made things worse:
“The 15-year-old brother came outside with his own semiautomatic handgun and allegedly shot the younger teen in the stomach”
There was - it made things worse:
“The 15-year-old brother came outside with his own semiautomatic handgun and allegedly shot the younger teen in the stomach”
Well that’s one way to deter car usage in future generations.
You could almost call it a “war on motorists”, Mr Sunak?
“buy”
deleted by creator
Sounds a lot like what Joel Spolsky was advocating for since 2003, although now it’s easier since most people already have a private office, just not in “the office”.
Enrique Tarrio attacked a religious display, was charged “misdemeanor destruction of property” and got 155 days prison.
V1 was a much larger pulsejet (hence the buzz) with a third of the range and ten times the payload of this thing
“The jury, he argued, was essentially allowed to conjure up damning evidence in their minds that may not have existed”
Well yes, that’s exactly what the court will do if they find that you’ve been deleting evidence - they assume that whatever you deleted must have been damning to the case otherwise why would you have told employees to use “delete after 24h” communication channels?
If you have access to BBC content (the broadcaster not the big people) then I would surely recommend viewing the whole series there!
The soldiers saw some (unarmed, shirtless) people and one of them immediately said “terrorists!”. That’s the level of analysis that’s going on when making kill decisions here.
deleted by creator
If the EV is the cheapest rental car, wouldn’t they already be expected to choose it?
“In May 1997 the Supreme Court unanimously rejected Bill Clinton’s claim that the Constitution immunized him from civil lawsuits”
Isn’t that already a precedent?
deleted by creator
problem here was that Google was doing deals to undermine those things
deleted by creator
problem with wormholes is that you can send information into the past - so if you receive a message, does that mean you’re predetermined to subsequently send that message?
Texas “was received as a commonwealth holding, maintaining and protecting the institution known as negro slavery-- the servitude of the African to the white race within her limits-- a relation that had existed from the first settlement of her wilderness by the white race, and which [Texas] people intended should exist in all future time”
Gee, what a hard question to figure out from historical sources, guess we’ll never know what they were thinking…