s

There may not be an evolutionary advantage. Humans have developed empathy to care for each other, so many of us tend to do what we can to ensure that those who may have inherited or developed disadvantageous traits can still live full and happy lives, which also means those genes may be passed on to future generations. Hairy ears, wisdom teeth, color blindness, cystic fibrosis, etc. all may be disadvantageous genetic traits, but this presents the ethical question of if we would rather help the individuals with these genes be happy and reproduce, or if we would rather tell these people that they are forbidden from passing on these genes to protect the next generation from the afflictions (by way of direct genocide, selective breeding of humans, or gene selection and embryo screening).

My brain read that as Tennessee at first and I was completely unfazed

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss

Change = Bad

Woke = Bad

therefore,

Change = Woke.

Conversely,

Regression = Anti-Woke

therefore,

Regression = Good

We have no values except for that which we think in the moment will make us the most money, and we hope the customers agree

They’ve legit already done that themselves

Star Trek NO COLON CAPITAL I Into Darkness

Judge: “Mr. Patel, what is your evidence that the accused committed this crime?”

Kash Patel: “Your Honor, it came to me in a dream.”

Judge: “Good enough for me. Guilty!”

That will go nicely with a tape measure that uses the Chinese inch (cùn), which is equal to 1.312 imperial inches

Empty the cup and then count them all

Oh yes, I am aware. The person I was replying to had implied that step 2 didn’t exist at all so I was making a more broad statement.

I do realize your username is literally GuyFawkes. Nevertheless, when somebody is doing wrong, the first approach should be to use reason and empathy as a point of argument. If that fails, then work to starve the oppressor of what they seek to exploit until they find that pursuit to be no longer in their interests. If that fails, then use whatever means necessary to ensure oppression ends and human rights that were once willingly suppressed instead become guaranteed.

Solution: sacrifice the richest people until their wealth adds up to $37 trillion and maybe a few more rich people just for extra security

Or scientific notation

Omg me

Oh, I didn’t mean his word salad specifically

Careful not to condemn word salad on the Fediverse or else you’ll get downvoted and told that it is completely comprehensible regardless of any grammatical nonsense.