A little insane, but in a good way.
Made the switch 4 years ago. No regrets.
First, thank you for the detailed response.
Second, I think you finally convinced me to delete my FB. I will link to this comment wherever possible to show people what a terrible company Meta is.
Can you tell us more about what they are like?
This is an excellent explanation of hashing, and the interactive animations make it very enjoyable and easy to follow.
I absolutely agree. But:
Obviously as a Hungarian I have a soft spot for Hungarian notation :) But in these cases I think it’s warranted.
I understand what you mean, and I even agree with it, but just to be a little pedantic, variable names are code, or at least they are more code than comments or docs.
But yes, encoding units into the type system is a much better solution. It doesn’t work however for config options, environment variables or CLI switches.
IIRC F# even has built-in support for units.
Well that sucks… for Reddit management
I’m sure it’s a nice client but I don’t understand why so many GUI projects have no screenshots in their READMEs. It would be great if I could immediately see if I like it without installing it.
EDIT: thanks for adding the screenshot to your post! It looks awesome!
This is pretty awesome and it shows how far .NET has come in recent years.
This looks like a fantastic resource, thank you for sharing it! Saved.
It isn’t far fetched that they use AI-powered bots to change the common sentiment about the blackout.
I actually welcome constructive criticism, and the brand of arrogance I’m so frustrated with is when people dismiss ideas or arguments without offering valid counterarguments. Or maybe when they take the worst possible interpretation of what someone says (see example above) and argue against that. Maybe my original post wasn’t clear enough.
While it’s true that separating emotions from the work itself and learning to accept justified criticism is important, even crucial, this fact doesn’t give free license to the people giving the criticism to be rude. Your comment seems to imply that what I perceive as arrogance is often justified when “senior devs” are defending their solutions based on their experience. But arrogance != conviction or confidence. Confidence paired with humility allows for open-mindedness, and creates a better environment for everyone involved. It encourages sharing and discussing ideas.
You also state that human emotions don’t belong in software development, then proceed to write a long rant that reeks of condescension, dismissiveness, annoyance, frustration and a feeling of superiority. Your comment is by no means neutral and analytical, it just displays emotions you feel are justified, while those felt by others are not. It’s hard not to conclude that you are exactly the type of person my original post is about.
You’re right, they also have to prove their counterarguments, and those who don’t do it are often bad programmers. But I’ve also experienced the same with some actually brilliant people.
That may be part of it but I’ve also observed it among fellow programmers.
You give your opinion about something and your coworker has a smug, arrogant knee-jerk reaction based on some cargo-cult belief without actually thinking about the details of the problem. Then you need to walk them through why what you said is not what they meant step-by-step, and while it may be wrong it is still a valid opinion. If you succeed, they completely change and become cooperative, and you can have an actually useful discussion. But you have to be super patient, like when taming an irritated feral cat that wants to scratch you. If you’re good, the cat becomes cuddly and cute.
This works but I’m extremely tired of having to perform this dance with 60% of the new coders I meet.
Haha, so true! I can definitely switch between “god at the keyboard” vs. “dog at the keyboard” within a single minute.
I’ve had nightmares less terrifying than this