Almost as if it’s artificial.
Almost as if it’s artificial.
Sure, but people seem to buy into that very buzz wordyness and ignore the usefulness of the technology as a whole because “ai bad.”
I’ll scratch it or lose it, and if I don’t, I’ll have a pile of plastic crap I don’t want. I’m not really worried about digital media being taken away, and I could find it again if need be.
I mean, I don’t want to either. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Gerrymandering affects the house. It’s the electoral college that affects the presidential election.
Seriously, their bias is right in the name.
They do this all the time, it’s really gross, take it as a badge of honor.
But that doesn’t make sugar bad. It makes too much sugar bad, which seems to be what they were saying. Albeit, ineloquently. **Insert thought terminating insult.
This but unironically.
Ya, but they were gonna make me buy a subscription for a mouse!
No need to be sanctimonious. It isn’t always justified that way, and it’s just worth considering, that’s all.
This poster is being annoying, but flexing mods powers in a pointless argument is gross. You do it a lot. Just let it go.
I ain’t here to kink shame, and yet, I am.
In other words, and less often repeated, “half of them are smarter than that!”
I suppose a woman of color will just have to wait then.🙄
“The electorate” was racist when Obama ran too, and there were racists saying he shouldn’t run too.
Sexism manifest.
There’s some sampling bias at play because you don’t hear about the less flashy examples. I use machine learning for particle physics, but there’s no marketing nor outrage about it.