What are you even talking about?

Yea. Really sad to see the price theyre paying for making the right decision once is 20% of their stock price…

Why does this billion dollar company not do exaxtly what I expect them to😡 They made great games because those are the ones I like and now they make shitty games because I dont like them.

The subtitle looks like TINGLINGS to me xD

Same. Those 40mil probably went into someones pocket, not surprising noone is playing the game

Didnt read the article. Does this mean steam will have to give the option to sell games or would you have to sell the whole account?

Thanks

You did get the /s in my comment tho right?

Exactly! Since when is it their job to keep track of political debates and news around the world? Politicians have their own shit to handle, we cant just keep pestering them with public worries.

It IS the part malfunctioning though, it says so pretty clearly. Boards come with risks but the board malfunctioning is neither inherent nor unavoidable. Thats the whole point.

If the maximum speed is 120, the car wont go over 120. You cant advertise a car with ‘only go 120 or the car will kill you’.

No, its like paragliding without a helmet, which a lot of people do btw.

You wouldnt recall the windshield because thats not the part malfunctioning. If a car keeps braking randomly while going 120 on the highway, it doesnt matter if you use a seatbelt or not, the car is faulty and thats what would get recalled.

I reread the text passage, it says pretty clearly ‘the Onewheel was malfunctioning’.

Just because you didnt follow the instructions to wear a seatbelt doesnt make it okay to be killed. Thats like saying running over pedestrians is alright if they are jaywalking, they dont count as traffic casualties. If the only deaths counted are those where every party involved perfectly obeyed all rules and acted 100% correctly, there wouldnt be many left. Cars would be considered completely safe.

Maybe not but logic isnt yours either

No its not and I cant believe I even have to say this lol. If I shoot you with a gun its on you for not wearing kevlar right? If your car explodes out of nowhere thats also on you for not wearing a seatbelt I suppose?

Not sure how not wearing a helmet makes it okay to be killed by a faulty product.

Thanks for that link, very interesting. I didnt cite the 94% though, I didnt even know about that statistic. Also, even if it isnt 94%, its probably close to that. Even if its just half of that, you cant blame the other half directly on the cars malfunction, those accidents are probably caused by many factors. So like I was saying, in this case the fault seems to lie entirely with the product.

The difference as far as I could tell from the text would be that car accidents are usually the users fault while this is attributed to the products failure or bad usability.

Ah I see. The models always had legs thats why I was confused^^

I dont understand. Legs as in the character models legs?