This is more of a priest behavior.

And the DOJ is announcing criminal charges against individuals implicated in such decisions and abuses, right???

/S

Racism or the food?

What’s stopping from vetoing any bill and making it say what you want?

Absolutely no carts in open aisles while-galloping

Abortion is legal

(Fucked up a few letters but point remains)

But there aren’t 150 catholic churches in Las vegas

Except we keep electing dick heads who literally don’t want to take his money.

I didn’t read the CNN piece as being overly critical. I read it as saying more like “hey she’s not all that bad. She’s actually pretty clever, but lack of trial experience is just bogging down process. She’s learning and doesn’t have anyone to mentor her in her lonely courthouse”

I left reading it a bit pissed off that such a fluff piece was even published.

TFW 911 leaves you on read

One of the issues is if material costs to maintain the property increase steeper than this cap.

Though the solution is pretty practical – cap it at inflation.

But they’re often the only thing available to correct an injustice. Should civil rights pioneers not have been pardoned?

Sentence him to two months to be served from November 15 to January 15.

Allowing a felon to run is a legitimate check and balance that the people can have against the government.

It allows for the people to correct someone convicted of a crime by an unjust law. It allows for correcting (actual) political persecution.

This is a healthy thing.

That said. Fuck disenfranchisement. Directly fix that.

Norway is in Nato…

Frankly it doesn’t matter. Japan has several private companies operating rail services. Tokyo has several subway systems.

We need more appropriately priced, accessible mass transit. I don’t care if it’s public or private.

Because nobody in any public transit board has ever implemented such a thing?

In North Carolina, park and ride busses for the state fair have long been a thing, among a litany of several other examples.

I think you’re remembering some instance where a pardon can expose the recipient to civil liability. Or at least it was theorized it might…

Bannon, stone or one of them.

It looks like the central organization revoked his membership status, not the local chapter…

Thanks, and your math makes sense, but I think this is a misinterpretation by op. It’s fair to say that as a percentage of expenditure… But not tax dollars.

Social security gets complicated because it’s set up as a trust fund and has investments that grow to support disbursement rates. It also means that the expenditures should be carved out, same as the inbound tax. This should shift the calculations meaningfully.

Oh cool you live in old Denmark?

But Massachusetts has snowy winters and icy conditions which means they need to salt the roads. This is not something that they have to contend with in check notes Sweden?

/S