you mean !collapse@toomanysymbols.confusingmarkup/killsusability&

you have no idea, the depths of my laziness… the vast wastelands of me not trying hard…

amazing! what other topics do you not want to watch a video about?

tell me more about how you don’t want to watch a video

no, it’s transparency about moderation… :

under AB 587, a “social media company” that meets the revenue threshold must provide to the California AG: A copy of their current terms of service. Semiannual reports on content moderation. The semiannual reports must include: (i) how the terms of service define certain categories of content (e.g., hate speech, extremism, disinformation, harassment and foreign political interference); (ii) how automated content moderation is enforced; (iii) how the company responds to reports of violations of the terms of service; and (iv) how the company responds to content or persons violating the terms of service. The reports must also provide detailed breakdowns of flagged content, including: the number of flagged items; the types of flagged content; the number of times flagged content was shared and viewed; whether action was taken by the social media company (such as removal, demonetization or deprioritization); and how the company responded.

you click the enter key…

law of large numbers: it’s probably fairly representative

strange funny, not haha funny…,