“they” uses the same number of characters as “s/he” and flows more naturally
try a factor of 100
I was referring to the fair in your hypothetical smartass
as if random civilians with guns wouldn’t bumble around more and also shoot the crowd?
metal detectors? pretty easy since it’s a ticketed event
how is a concern about upending precedent a nonsensical statement? the source of an argument does not impact its validity as a point
but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument
but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument
not saying you’re wrong, but that is a whataboutism
I meant that both only exist due to the labor of individuals. without the workforce, billionaires and corporations would not exist
arguably billionaires and corporations are still people-powered
edit: as in the wealth of billionaires and corporations only exists due to the exploration of the labor of the people. without that labor, billionaires wouldn’t exist
no true scotsman fallacy
can confirm
interesting that you assume the teacher is a he
well obviously people who buy black market drugs don’t have a better solution available. use some critical thinking, it won’t hurt you
nuance won’t hurt you, I promise <3
no they’re arguing that companies should not be allowed to intentionally make addicting products. akin to the difference between the caffeine found in coffee vs if a company started selling pure caffeine powder
yes, that is their point
oh no!! good thing that doesn’t impact anything