School administrators in Kansas this September violated an eight-year old Native American boy’s cultural and religious freedoms when they required him to cut his long hair to conform to school policy, according to the Kansas American Civil Liberties Union Foundation (ACLU).
The boy, a member of the Wyandotte Nation of Oklahoma, had been growing his hair for more than a year after seeing tribal men wear their hair long at the Nation’s annual gathering of the Little Turtles, according to the letter the ACLU sent Girard School District administrators on November 17. The boy was attending Haderlein Elementary School in Girard, Kansas.
The boy’s mother learned of the school’s “Boy’s hair length” policy in August 2023, and visited the school the following month to request an exemption for her son “because of his Native American heritage and spiritual beliefs,” according to the ACLU. The school’s policy forbids boys, but not girls, from wearing their hair long.
“Hair is not to touch the collar of a crew neck t-shirt, cover the eyebrows, or extend below the earlobes. Ponytails, rat tails, or any other style that would circumvent the policy are not permitted,” the policy reads. She was told there were no exemptions.
On September 23, 2023, Haderlein Elementary School Assistant Principal Joni Benso emailed the student’s mother, informing her that if her child’s hair was not cut by the following Monday, “he will be sent home.”
Neither Benso nor the school’s Principal, Tina Daniel, responded to Native News Online’s request for comment.
“Ultimately,” the letter reads, “to ensure that the student would be able to continue attending school, rather than being ‘sent home’ or facing other punishment, he was forced to cut his hair over the weekend of September 22, 2023.”
The Wyandotte Nation said in a statement to Native News Online that, while not directly involved, the nation is aware of the incident, and it harkens back to decades of cultural oppression against Indigenous peoples.
“This oppression has taken many forms including, but not limited to, the forced cutting of Native American men and boys’ hair in order to impose conformity with dominant white culture and to stifle long-held religious and traditional Native American practices and beliefs,” the Nation’s response, emailed from Chief Billy Friend, reads. “The apex of this oppressive tactic can be found during the tragic Indian boarding school era, when Native children were taken from their homes and communities, relocated to strange and distant boarding schools, and forcibly assimilated through, among other means, the cutting short of boys’ hair.”
Chief Friend added that long hair is a cultural tradition in his nation that hasn’t been practiced for the past several decades, “but many in our current generation have [begun] to practice once again.”
The ACLU asserted that Haderlein Elementary School’s policy and refusal to accommodate the student’s religious and cultural practices violates the Kansas Preservation of Religious Freedom Act, the U.S. Constitution, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Girard Schools Superintendent Todd Ferguson responded to an email from Native News Online on Tuesday stating that: “Nothing matters more to the USD 248 district and staff than creating a safe, respectful and caring school for every student.”
Ferguson said he was unable to comment on individual students due to confidentiality, but that the Board of Education will review and consider updates to the dress code policy on December 14.
The Wyandotte Nation urged the Girard Schools Unified School District 248 in their statement to reconsider its policy governing boys’ hair length “in light of the unique history involving Native American children.”
“This is a culturally sensitive issue that brings to light historical traumas for many Tribal Nations, beyond our own,” the nation wrote.
In March 2022, a Native American student in the first-grade had his long hair forcibly cut off by two other students while attending school at Del City Elementary in Oklahoma, prompting an internal investigation. Last week, the UC Health Hospital in Aurora, Colorado, on Friday finally admitted that a hospital staff member cut the hair of 65-year-old Lakota elder Arthur Janis, without his or his family’s permission. On November 18, Native News Online’s publisher Levi Rickert wrote a column about the sacredness of hair to Native Americans.
“We hope that a respectful, culturally informed discourse between the family and the school representatives will ultimately lead to a workable resolution.”
This should be a slam dunk under Title II of the Civil Rights Act - not even because of the boy’s Native American heritage, but simply because he is a boy and the rule doesn’t apply to girls.
Slam dunk under religious freedom (first amendment). So fucking basic.
Ah, so the religious exemptions are only for the crazy christians.
They are going to get a bloody asshole from the fucking that the ACLU is going to do. One: the rule is sexist, and two: it violates religious freedoms.
Can’t wait for them to remove the rule while figuring out how to sit again.
What the fuck is with these goddamn white people in deep red states and their fucking obsession with non-white hair? It’s the same shit as tx (I think) trying to force a black kid to cut his hair and tried to get him suspended and shit for it. Black hair doesn’t work like white hair for fucks sake.
I mean, logically I know the answer is simply racism, but like holy fucking shit, how is hair the hill you’re dying on?
You’re right about the racism, but they don’t like long hair on white dudes either. Long hair is a great way to get extra attention from the cops and bigoted locals.
It’s not about the hair. It’s about control.
Hair is a very important part of self-identity, therefore forcing vulnerable people to change the appearance of their hair is a form of punishment which may appear harmless to onlookers, yet is deeply psychologically harmful.
Back in middle school, 28 years ago, I had a native american friend named Eagle Boy. First day of 8th grade a new teacher kept pressing him on what his real name is. She eventually told him to tell her is “christian” name. I see nothing has changed.
This is exactly why I donate to the ACLU.
Hair is a super important identity marker, for everyone! The army has uniform buzz cuts for a reason, and historically strictly enforced on to minorities, it’s all about forced assimilation and control. Asking this child to get in line and look like the rest of the unit is specfically trying to rid him of his culture. Can’t believe this shit is still occurring.
The native American genocide never ended
With how little there are left, they’ll be needed out in a not so long time
Calling this genocide dilutes the importance of the word
I feel like maybe you missed the parts of American history where the settlers killed all the Native Americans and took their land.
Harass these administrators until they resign.
And yet, all he had to do was tell the school he identified as female and the rule would no longer apply. /s
Different rules for males and females should be thrown in the trash heap.
This is why I hate school rules. Too many random stuff to constrain students for no good reason. Hire a fucking law expert if they want to go farther than “be nice”.
Abolish schools
Based
Yeah let’s rely on parents and “other institutions” to educate kids, that’ll work out great I’m sure.
So Jesus would not be allowed to attend this public school?
Nah, he’s too old
They’d be too busy dealing with their heads exploding when they saw the color of his skin to complain about his long hair.
What the fuck?
Even setting aside the cultural/religious issues, didn’t the US outgrow this ludicrous obsession with boys’ hair like 50 years ago?
The US has been shifting backwards in a lot of ways for years.
Not rural America, their bigotry knows no limit, temporal or otherwise.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
This is crazy, I imagine they’re never seen a Sikh boy then? In my part of the world I’ve seen several faith based schools that made exemptions to hair dress code stuff for Sikh students. The Sikh religion, if I understand correctly, means they don’t make any modifications to their body, including hair. What’s the difference here? Why make such a big deal of this?
Racism. And a lot of sikhs were attacked after 911 in particular because people thought they were muslim and therefore assumed to be terrorists…
One of the reasons that Sikhs have ceremonial daggers is because hundreds of years ago they got attacked by Muslims. Now they get mistaken for Muslims. One of those very unfunny ironies
Or, instead of making one-off exemptions, they could just scrap the entire stupid pointless hair length rule completely.
Absolutely. I understand if private schools wanna create an image of discipline through uniforms age dress code, but for a public school to go this far? Crazy
Of course no one in bumfuck Kansas has seen a Sikh person or know anything of their customs. And if they did meet one they would apply the same racism to them as everyone else non-white/cis/straight/christian
Lol this is Kansas. Most of those people have probably only seen a black person like twice, never mind Sikh or other Non-American minority groups.
What is it with schools just begging to be sued lately?
this shit got ruled on years ago, what the fuck
New supreme court new rules…
Haderlein Elementary School is a public school, in case you were wondering.