I wanted to share this opinion on Hackaday about a topic that is the usefulness of a something that has become ubiquitous relatively fast.

This techonolgyy has a lot of potential, what do you think?

  • aard@kyu.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m in my 40s and therefore generally in the “get off my lawn, kids” age.

    But I totally agree with that article. I’ve converted quite a few legacy devices with barrel jack to USB-C - and got rid of a huge box of junky old power bricks. Especially for devices I only use occasionally I don’t want to search for the matching power bricks - I just want to plug it into one of the 4 USB-C PD sockets I have installed into my desk.

      • aard@kyu.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        Older notebooks, battery chargers, PMR radios, pretty much everything taking less than 100W DC current.

        • M500@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Oh yeah! I’m dumb! I totally get it. Anytime I buy tech I make sure it’s usb-c if it’s not, then I’m not buying it.

          The only non-usbc device left is my wife’s iPhone 13 and a Bluetooth speaker we hardly use.

          Have you ever used one of those 9-in-1 usb-c hubs? They blow my mind, how can so much io be handled by that one connection?

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I use one of those hubs and it’s enough to charge my laptop.

            Simple answer is that higher voltage is easier to deal with than higher current. USB originally ran it 5V, which would take 12A of current to provide 60W. The wire would be 14AWG, which is 1.63mm thick. Conversely, if you increase the voltage to 20V (as USB-PD can do), you now only need 3A, and the wire can be much thinner/cheaper.

            The wire doesn’t care about voltage for the most part. The insulation around it needs to be thick enough to keep it from shorting to other wires and stuff around it, but it doesn’t take much insulation to be rated for 300V; way more than we need here.

    • ShadowRam@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Meh. I hate it.

      I think society should be moving towards buildings having a dedicated DC source.
      International Standardize on a DC wall plug.

      Each device can step it down easily/efficiently with little electronics to their own needs.

      • aard@kyu.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s pretty much the “we should all put PoE everywhere” debate, and I don’t think that’ll happen (or is a good idea) - and that’s coming from me as someone with switches providing 1.5kW of PoE power budget in the garage.

        The alternative would be a shared conductor like we have now - and while that is working will in data centres doing a conductor in the required dimensions for that would be too big, and potentially dangerous, so that’ll happen even less.

        • ShadowRam@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, it’s got nothing to do with power over ethernet.

          It’s simply having only one high power rectifier at the breaker box.

          And removing all those rectifiers from every device in the house.

          We don’t need AC in the home anymore. Every device is now using DC, and any other device will still work with DC.
          The only thing really left are motors, but even those are going brushless and we can chop half of the inverter out of the equation of those as well.

          And every device won’t even need smart electronics for PD either.

          It would also solve the North America 60Hz and EU 50Hz issue, where the AC coming in doesn’t matter. We all standardize on a DC output.

          And when people want to add alternative power (Solar/Wind/etc), it’s a HELL of a lot easier to just push the DC into the existing system without having to worry about frequency matching.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            It would also solve the North America 60Hz and EU 50Hz issue

            Since when is it an issue?

            A lot of stuff accepts both and the plugs are different anyways so why does it matter?

            Btw most of the world uses 50hz not just the EU.

              • lud@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yeah, but they would be simpler but you would instead have to put powerful DC-DC converters in pretty much everything.

                It sounds like a solution to a problem which isn’t a big deal. In theory it might be nice but it works fine as it is. We know very well how home AC grids work and charging that would be a mess.

                • ShadowRam@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  powerful DC-DC

                  No, are you not aware how these work?

                  A step down DC-DC is nothing compared to a transformer rectifier or PD electronics with communication with a USB-C.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              It was once upon a time, in the age of olde, where switched-mode power supplies were not the norm and GaN semiconductors weren’t in the process of taking over the whole power IC market. Taking in any mains voltage/frequency and spitting out any reasonable DC voltage is no issue for those things, they simply don’t care.

              It’s still going to be an issue in the future but pretty much only for resistive heaters (well, at least the voltage part) and motors with oomph.

              Speaking of DC though: The EU is looking into applying HVDC not just to point-to-point connections but at a network level. Don’t expect that to hit your home in your lifetime, but if you’re an aluminium smelter it would make a lot of sense to have a direct connection to tons of DC.

          • m0darn@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            We don’t need AC in the home anymore.

            I laughed and wrote out a list of things in my house using AC but I see you’re talking more theoretically. Most of the things using ac in my house are only ever plugged into one circuit, so we could leave those circuits alone. I don’t think USB C PD could handle a hairdryer though, and they aren’t always used on the same circuits (eg sometimes bathroom, sometimes bedroom)

            It’s really tough to displace entrenched standards.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Lots of small kitchen appliances would be out of luck. Or how about vacuum cleaners as an example that needs a lot of power but might be plugged in for every room …. Where would I recharge batteries for my lawn care equipment?

              • ShadowRam@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                What?

                Most vaccums are brushless, where they are already converting the AC to DC internally. Your vacuums would be cheaper.

                Where would I recharge batteries for my lawn care equipment?

                again what? The same way? Your charger is converting AC to DC. You could skip that step.

                All of these appliances would work better/cheaper with a 110VDC@15A source.

                • AA5B@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Yeah I think many of us missed that you’re proposing a full power replacement circuit, rather than USB power everywhere

                  One of the things you’re missing about USB and would likely lose here is that it’s “smart”. Both sides negotiate an acceptable power profile. If you only have one converter for the house I don’t think you could easily deliver many different power profiles to many points

            • ShadowRam@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              _ I don’t think USB C PD could handle a hairdryer though_

              Of course it wouldn’t. The idea would be get rid of USB-C and PD completely.

              You’d have 110VDC@15A available for your hairdryer. Heating coils don’t care if it’s AC or DC, and the blower fan would be a brushless fan.

              You’re compressors for AC or fridge would be freq drives, which are cheaper because they could drop the rectifier circuit, and highly efficient.

              The only real concern about having DC in the home as standard is the safety aspect of DC doesn’t let go if you get shocked.

              But that is already being worked on in general as many homes have high-voltage DC circuits from solar panels.

              • m0darn@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                But different devices need different voltages. Does every outlet in my house have to have its own connection to the central rectifier? It’s a lot of re wiring.

                • ShadowRam@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  PWM DC to DC dropping voltage to what you need is easy/cheep.

                  So instead of a big transformer + rectifier that each device has now, it would be a much smaller/cheaper step down at like 99.8% efficiency

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        We did. It’s called USB-C and my house has outlets with AC/USB-C combo.

        You want another standard?

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          PoE would be that standard, since it’s 48V already and can run all over the house. However, we don’t actually save anything in terms of efficiency by having everything be DC.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          More importantly, standards do change. Many of us did the same with USB-A, now a few years later we can update to USB-C by replacing outlets cheaply.

          Can you imagine having to replace both the outlets for a new connector and a house-sized converter for new power profiles? So expensive and likely turns a simple DIY project into calling an electrician

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The problem is that nothing wants the same DC voltage. It wants 3.3V, or 5V, or 12V, or 48V, or 18.7V, or whatever. You end up with layers of conversion and save nothing in the end.

        Let’s say you start with solar photovoltaic panels, a DC source. It feeds into a DC-DC inverter that puts out a steady 48V. Existing DC-AC microinverters can get 95% efficiency, and DC-DC conversion can be around the same.

        In an AC system, we convert to DC at point of use (be it through a wall wort, a floor wort, a USB power port integrated into traditional AC plugs, or something else). This conversion can likewise be around 95% efficient.

        In a DC system, we still have to do a DC-DC conversion to get the voltage you actually want at point of use. This is around 95% efficient, as well.

        In the end, we stack the same number of conversions at around 95% efficiency no matter if we run AC or DC. Except that assumes we’re coming from a DC source in the first place, like solar photovoltaic. If we come from an AC source, like wind or hydro or pretty much anything besides a solar panel, then we only have transformer losses of converting the higher line AC voltage to what your house uses. Those aren’t 95% efficient; they’re closer to 98% efficient, so we’re better off.

        Not only that, but we would still prefer AC for basically anything with a high draw motor, like air con or refrigerators. Now we’re doing DC-AC conversion, and that’s closer to 85% efficient. These are some of the highest draw items in a house–and they’re going to be used more as heat pumps for HVAC, water heaters, and clothes dryers become more common–so that drop in efficiency hits that much harder.

        So DC home power sounds like a good idea until you break down how conversion efficiency hits things in practice. If we’re just going to get to the same place, why bother ripping out our current system?

        That said, I would like to see PoE get used for residential more. There’s lots of devices that can run off 48V and can also use networking (like smart LED lights). Why not put it over the same plug and skip having to put those devices on a wireless network? Also, you don’t need a licensed electrician to run it. You can’t be an idiot about how to run and terminate it, but you don’t need a license. This would likely be alongside our existing AC wiring, though.

        • ShadowRam@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          _ It wants 3.3V, or 5V, or 12V, or 48V, or 18.7V,

          Exactly

          That’s why if you had a 110VDC supply at the wall, you do a simple PWM step-down to the required voltage in every device.

          LOADS cheaper/efficient than any USB-C PD circuit…

          Saves on transformers, saves on dozens of USB PD wall outlets, saves on communication needed to communicate the PD required between each device and every USB PD wall outlet.

          Much cheaper. More efficient.

          If only the wall was 100VDC instead of AC

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Why would 100VDC help over AC? You lose very little by rectifying AC.

            And again, these aren’t the high draw items in the house. Stuff with motors are, like air con and refrigerators. Those are better left on AC. Why bother when the gains are small?

            • ShadowRam@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Stuff with motors are, like air con and refrigerators. Those are better left on AC.

              No. Trend is they are all showing up with frequency drives. Of which those inverters are rectifying to DC before making their own AC.
              Efficiency gains are massive of a frequency drive , hence why they are doing it.
              Would be even better if they could drop the first rectifying circuit and just use the inverter portion only.

              You lose very little by rectifying AC

              You lose a lot actually in all the small cheap rectifiers that are in every device in the house.

              Where a single purpose designed FET rectifier that is built for efficiency at the breaker would be drastically better.

        • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          In general, you don’t want DC or Ethernet cabling directly next to AC wiring. I forget the exact rules and distances, but you definitely don’t want them in the same conduit at least. Shielding only helps so much. Just a general note as you probably didn’t mean it quite so literally…

          I do like PoE though! I have a server rack that powers a bunch of RPi 4s through a PoE+ switch. Had to make sure there was plenty of headroom as RPi 4s can pull just a wee bit of current under full load. I am just happy it works at all.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s running parallel to AC wiring. It’s usually not a big deal in practice, except for higher draw cable.

            • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Your right. I was thinking about my job that runs 480VAC. Either way, testing for interference and noise when you run into issues can go a long way. I am just glad that, to my knowledge, CAT 7 is one standard with everything shielded. CAT 6 had so many variations and most packaging and online portals would not even tell you which ones they were using in the first place. Almost as bad as USB-C connectors.I gave up and ordered some short CAT 7 patch cables for the server so I wouldn’t stress over it. Ended up being a little cheaper than a lot of the cat 6 sets too.

        • ShadowRam@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, AC requires large heavy transformers and then rectifying.

          DC dropping down to a lower DC is way easier and more efficient.

        • ShadowRam@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yeah, but frequency drives/inverters were still pretty pricy things back then to for high powered motors for compressors/blowers/etc.

          But the cost and efficiency of those things have dropped SIGNIFICANTLY in the past decade…

  • rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    Some AI written post’s language really sucks, and this is one of them.

      • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s very difficult to quote Douglas Adams without sounding like you’re pandering to nerd culture. I don’t think AI could pull it off.

        I don’t know what to think of someone who could blast off accusations like this, either.

        Edit: Oh. The accusation is even dumber. It’s just the header OP wrote. That was just direct to the point writing. AI or no, who cares about two tiny paragraphs.

        Edit: Filled in the words my brain thought were there for everybody.

      • Corgana@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Just your normal redditor who didn’t create anything trying to feel superior by dismissing someone else’s effort. Don’t overthink it.

      • lgsp@feddit.it@feddit.itOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        Thank you. Also I could have written it better. Reading what I wrote again I wasn’t happy at all. It really sounded a bit fake…

        • Corhen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          you wrote it? Cool!

          I’ve really been loving USB PD, and retrofit into several devices i use. My big next interest is the USB PPS, allowing devices to request extermly minute adjustments to the voltage, instead of just “9v”

          • lgsp@feddit.it@feddit.itOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            No, I only wrote the intro of this Lemmy thread. It’s the part that @rusticus@lemm.ee said was AI generated. At least that was my understanding.

            I really hope that the hackaday article cannot be confused with ai generated garbage… Or maybe my taste is really bad!

          • bluewing@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            A question because I don’t really understand:

            Does those “really minute” voltage adjustments really matter for the vast majority of things you can use USB PPS for? I’m sure there are some devices out there that do, but I would think most don’t care too much if the power is 9VDC or even 6VDC or 12VDC for brief periods. Perhaps the slightly increased lifespan might matter or not.

            • Corhen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yea, i do think it will help, primarily with battery charging.

              Right now, in order to protect the battery, the phone will request 9v, then step it down as the battery charges, and send a reduced voltage to the battery, so over time the battery might see 9v… 8.95vm 8.9v, 8.85v…

              This allows the step down to happen at the charger, instead of in the phone, increasing efficiency, and reducing heat in the phone.

              • bluewing@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                I think there might be an issue with the propensity of people to use random chargers. If it fits, it has to be OK right? I’m not sure one should trust the charger to step down the voltage as it charges a device. Lots of poorly designed aftermarket chargers out there and you won’t be able to make the bad ones all disappear overnight. The device needs to protect itself from the stupidity of the user.

                • Corhen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Definitely get what you are saying, but I already trust the charger to take 120-240v AC to 5-48v DC.

                  Going from 9.0 to 8.85v is a much smaller regulation

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I wish PoE would get more love. Networking and power in one package. Voltage is high enough that you can run it around your house without too much power loss, but not so high that you are supposed to have a licensed electrician do it. The equipment for it is getting cheaper. It’s easily powerful enough to run smart LED lights without wireless network nonsense. Plus, you can give your PoE switch its own dedicated UPS, and now your lights are all on battery backup.

    It was born for a corporate IT environment for running VoIP phones and security cameras, and mostly ignored for residential customers. Good news is that used 48 port switches with full PoE are cheap on eBay.

    • Dale'sDeadBug@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I love PoE, but there are some hard limitations to that idea. Mainly cost per meter of cable, but also in the amount of runs that would need to be completed to accomplish that. I cant splice two ethernet cables together and run one to a nearby light or other device without a switch, which means more equipment or more cable to make it work. Also, being 48v, it will have a lower overall efficiency compared to direct wiring with 110-220v, especially with the higher resistance of ethernet vs 14ga romex. That being said, I’d love to see 48v dc in home outlets.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        If we’re talking about hiring someone to run AC wires, then the cost of extra equipment can be offset by the labor costs.

        (I have definitely hired a master electrician for every outlet added to my house. Definitely.)

      • Flipper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh boy do I have something for you. The single pair ethernet standards. Connect 8 devices on the same line as a bus.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That would only allow PoE+, which limits devices to 25.5W. Speed would be limited to 100Mbps. Still enough for lights, though.

        • Dale'sDeadBug@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Didn’t realize that was part of the spec. But wouldn’t that be 4 devices? 2 wires per device for tx/rx and power +/-.

          • Flipper@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            No. It’s a single twisted pair wire to connect at least 8 devices over a minimum distance of 25m. However the speed is only 10MBit. The spec is called base10-t1s

    • laverabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      PoE is terrible. I threw mine away and went to 802.11ac wireless and it was 10x faster. The problem is the circuit breakers, washing machines, or anything that generates EMI screw with the quality. Ethernet>wifi>PoE, at least for most use cases.

      • Brickhead92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think you are confusing PoE (Power over Ethernet) with EoP (Ethernet over Power).

        PoE: is an ethernet technology that uses the ethernet cabling to power small devices like APs, phones, cameras, etc. while providing an ethernet connection.

        EoP: is using a pair (or more) of devices that plug into power outlets which you then connect ethernet cables to. This “extends” the ethernet cabling over the power cables in your house.

      • Jtskywalker@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Are you talking about the adapters that let you run network through your electrical circuits? Because that’s different from PoE. PoE is running power through the network cables so you get power and network with one plug, so kind of the opposite of that.

        I can confirm that using electrical infrastructure for network is really not great.

        • laverabe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ah yes, that is what I was thinking of, thought that was the same thing since it was power and Ethernet together.

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I generally like USB-PD, as you can generally plug in any PD compliant device into any PD compliant charger and it will charge. The connector doesn’t even matter, PD works over Lightning and for example MagSafe as well.

    What I found to be lacking are these multi-port charging bricks. They do a solid job at charging battery-powered devices, but most of them renegotiate the power contract with every connected device when you plug another one in or remove one. I tried multiple chargers by Anker, Ugreen and Belkin and they all do that. Apparently Apple’s dual 35 watts USB-C charger doesn’t, but manages to renegotiate without a momentary disconnect. It’s only 35 watts though, so it’s not practical for many use cases.

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Is there any disadvantage to this renegotiation? As far as I know, it happens to make sure the charging block doesnt burn your house down.

      • Toes♀@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        10 months ago

        The biggest problem is that devices that aren’t battery powered will reboot.

        Ideally you would have each port on its own isolated bus.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          I suspect a most people call power bricks “chargers” and forget there are non-battery-powered devices that they can power.

      • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        USB-PD can be used for more than just charging. If you’re running something (a headphone amp for example) from one port of a multi-port brick, you don’t want it to stop momentarily every time you plug or unplug one of the other ports.

      • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, if the device isn’t battery powered. Think one-board computers or also docks (for example Steam Deck Dock). The Deck doesn’t turn off, but the dock switches to being powered by the Steam Deck momentarily, which resets its ports as well (display and network disconnects briefly).

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I believe that’s because the power needs to be shared between the ports. They normally have a maximum combined output that gets split between devices based on what charging speed they support.

      • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, but apparently you can renegotiate without briefly disconnecting, as that’s what the Apple charger apparently does. Not sure how this works on a technical level, but all multiport chargers should do that. Most don’t.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I carry around a two port 110w GaN charger for the laptops. Fast charges everything else.

  • XTL@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I hope there will be a more robust connector option some day. But this situation already beats most of the alternatives and especially the tangled mess of incompatible cables and power supplies.

    And with a bit of smarts, it can even work in two directions, charging one device off the battery of another.

  • JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve modified a few devices to charge or be powered with USB C. I’ve also modified devices with USB C That didn’t work correctly because they were missing the pull down resistors on the CC lines.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    What hurray? USB-C and PD are both monstrosities (though of course the mini and micro USB connectors were even worse). We already had a perfectly good low power standard, regular 5 volt USB. It’s just that higher power was wanted. But we have that already too, automotive 12 volt DC, and various options after that. It’s just the mobile phone industry’s obsession with thin, tiny connectors that are causing this.

  • laverabe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    For mobile phones it’s a good standard, but mfgs are putting them on desktop computers and laptop power plugs as primary power. That’s just dumb, these things are all going to fail in 10 years of regular use where USB-A could easily hold up mechanically for 50. But it’s suppose to be a data connector only. Combining things only makes devices less repairable. Broken USB-C jack? Well, better toss the laptop.

    • Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      USB-A is only rated for 1,500 mating cycles, whereas USB-C is supposed to last for 10,000… Though in reality the ports on my phones seem to start getting too loose to hold the jack in at around 1,000 cycles. Still, it’s not a totally unreasonable standard, and any device that hasn’t been designed to be thrown away should have ports broken out onto replaceable subassemblies – as is the case with many business-class laptops, for instance – so replacing a failed USB-PD port shouldn’t be too much trouble.

      • egonallanon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        For phones I’ve found the issue is lint/dust getting in the port and clearing that out makes the port work like new again.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve never seen a spare barrel jack on a laptop but a lot of laptops allow charging on multiple USBc ports. For full fat desktops though it’s basically a non starter. I think it’ll really shine when it comes to small electronics like moderns/routers, clock radios, electric toothbrushes, children’s toys, and other little things that come with barrel jacks.

  • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I have a love/hate relationship with USB. The form factor of USB-C is fine, that’d be great to standardize it, but mechanically I prefer Apple’s lightning connector.

    After multiple projects I’ve worked on that involved wiring up devices to use USB in ways other than the creator of USB intended, USB can fuck right off. I watched a video on how to properly wire up a shielded cable and the guy said that the creator of USB had no idea of how electricity flows through devices and now I agree.

    Edit: I’m curious why I’m getting downvoted.