• Synestine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        From the top of my head, compared to ext4: RAM use and the ability to shrink an FS if necessary. Oh, also I’ve used an EXT FS driver on a Windows host, but I’ve never seen one for XFS.

        • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just to clarify, the previous comment asked about benefits of XFS over ext4. But I completely agree with your reasons for choosing ext4.

          • Synestine@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh, my bad.

            The two benefits to XFS that I’ve ever seen are that it has no inode limit like ext4 (which prevents the FS shrink). The other is that it seems to handle simultaneous I/O better than ext4 does; think very active database volumes and datastores.

    • Kata1yst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rock solid may be a stretch. They still suffer from outrageous metadata bugs even to this day when used in busy file systems.

      That bug alone has been open for over a decade. Development focus of the people who understand and want to fix those things have shifted to other filesystems like ext4 and ZFS.