Police are still searching for a suspect.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe the poster is talking more generally, not specifically to conservatives on Lemmy?

        They’re just, putting the message out there, but it’s posted here because it relates to the subject.

    • 30mag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who is responsible when a drunk driver kills someone? Not the driver, right?

      • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably the people suing over the right to drive drunk as long as you don’t crash into someone and using the fact that most people who drive drunk do not get into accidents should get a portion of the blame.

        • 30mag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was suggesting that we hold the drunk driver responsible for their actions and we do not instead blame Henry Ford for his role in the proliferation of automobiles.

            • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Don’t forget they are also heavily and continuously regulated to reduce the danger to society whenever possible.

              Isn’t it incredible what you can accomplish when you don’t have a self-absorbed death cult insisting they know best?

              • 30mag@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Don’t forget they are also heavily and continuously regulated to reduce the danger to society whenever possible.

                Yes. There are laws governing the operation of motor vehicles on public roadways.

            • 30mag@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Guns don’t provide nearly the same utility as a car, and arguably no positive utility at all, in modern society.

              Law enforcement seems to think otherwise.

          • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We had this conversation actually, about a hundred years ago, that’s why you can’t just buy a car at a car show and drive it on public roads without a test, a license, and without following the rules. If Henry Ford fought more vigorously at the time, we wouldn’t have this rules, and then all the excessive deaths would be his fault also. In fact, a lot of the problems with car culture in US can be traced to specific people and companies, and they have a big portion of responsibilities for excessive deaths.
            And that’s talking about a car, a car’s primary usage is not a murder. You don’t need to overcome any of those hurdles to obtain and operate a firearm in a lot of cases, and the firearm’s primary purpose is to kill, so it’s even less excusable.

            • 30mag@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              you can’t just buy a car at a car show and drive it on public roads without a test, a license, and without following the rules

              I don’t have a problem with requiring training and a license to carry a firearm in public.

              • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                And then we come to the second part of it. Why do you ever need to carry a firearm in public, what purpose can it server in a society, what problem it solves

                • 30mag@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Why do you ever need to carry a firearm in public

                  Why do you ever need to carry pepper spray in public? Do you believe that we should prohibiting carrying pepper spray in public as well?

                  what purpose can it server in a society, what problem it solves

                  Do you think we ought to ban everything that does not solve some problem in society, such as recreational drugs?

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    More than 4,000 children and teenagers have been shot this year, according to data published by the Gun Violence Archive (GVA). At least 6,170 children and teenagers were shot in 2022, according to GVA.

    • Falmarri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      96
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly it’s pretty disingenuous to lump children and teenagers together, especially if talking about all the way to 17 or even 19

        • Falmarri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          42
          ·
          1 year ago

          I said even if it’s up to 17 it’s misleading. A lot of those 16, 17 year old shooting victims are gang members being shot in shoot outs. Which is a fundamentally different problem from a 9 year old being shot. And lumping those things together does a disservice.

          • deft@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            well first you coulda just checked yourself.

            second, why? a 16 year old shooting other 16 year olds are children killing, that is still a problem related to guns

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly it’s pretty disingenuous to lump children and teenagers together, especially if talking about all the way to 17 or even 19

        Hi, Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz.

          • horrorslice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Teenagers are still children. They don’t have developed brains. Also take into account that teenagers are growing up more slowly than they did in the past. It is not disingenuous to put them together in the same statistic.

            Commenter below mentions that the statistic used is Americans under the age of 18. They are not adults mentally or legally. They are children.

            • Falmarri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              They don’t have developed brains

              24 year olds don’t have developed brains either. What’s your point?

              It is not disingenuous to put them together in the same statistic.

              Absolutely it is

      • namelessdread@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The data referenced in that quote is linked in the article. When following the link, it specifies “Americans under the age of 18”

        Full info: The Gun Violence Archive

        Americans under the age of 18 killed or injured by gunfire since 2014:

        2014: 2,861

        2015: 3,378

        2016: 3,820

        2017: 3,982

        2018: 3,543

        2019: 3,825

        2020: 5,159

        2021: 5,705

        2022: 6,170

        2023: 4,319 [in 235 days]

        • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just like quarterly profits the peak of human society aims for a high score every single time. Numbers must go up. ALL NUMBERS must go up. Always. Capitalism is the best.

        • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          He doesn’t care. The “they include 19 year olds” is just the talking point he’s been taught when those figures are mentioned, because sometimes they’re described as “children”, rather than “children and teenagers”, which means they can attack the data as misleading.

          There’s no concious thought behind it, it’s just trigger and response. That’s why they’ll say the same things even when the data is correctly described.

          When they do try and come up with their own excuses, they’re usually terrible. I’ve genuinely had one argue that “17 year olds aren’t teenagers” by claiming that when the word “teenagers” was coined, it was only supposed to mean 13 and 14 year olds and we were somehow being dishonest for using the definition that absolutely everyone in the entire world works with.

          But they don’t need their arguments to make sense or their lies about keeping people safe to come true because they intend to drag the conversation out forever.

          Unfortunately for them, the kids who grew up among the school shootings will vote one day and they’ll have no issue removing the second amendment entirely.

        • Falmarri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          “17 year old gang members killing each other is a different problem from 9 year olds being shot and shouldn’t be lumped together”. Crazy, right?

          • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh I understand now, you think the 17 year olds don’t count because they’re black. Here I was thinking you were reprehensible.

            I guess you haven’t looked into how many of those 17 year old statistics took their fathers poorly secured gun (that was for “keeping his family safe” of course) and blew their brains out in the living room.

            Let’s hope the poor innocent gun didn’t get scuffed or scratched when it fell to the floor since it’s clear what was more important.

            I wonder how many of them used to be “responsible gun owners” who taught their children to “treat guns with respect”, not knowing they were teaching their kid how to load and fire the round that would kill them?

            Oh well, I’m sure it will never happen to you and I’m sure those fathers never thought it would never happen to them.

            • Falmarri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh I understand now, you think the 17 year olds don’t count because they’re black

              Lol wtf? What the shit are you talking about?

              • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                There’s no need to be coy – even the most deeply stupid Americans know what terms like “gang members”, “thugs” and “urban crime” are innuendo for, because deeply stupid Americans are the target demographic.

                If you want to get upset at people saying it out loud, you’re going to have to dig up Lee Atwater and throw a tantrum at his rotting, cancerous corpse.

                • Falmarri@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This is probably the stupidest comment I’ve ever read. Are you suggesting it’s impossible to talk about gangs without it being racist?

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The last time I saw a difference between an 18-year-old, a 17-year-old, a 16-year-old, and a child younger than that was when I was 18

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s time to change the American National Anthem to “Another One Bites the Dust”.

      • tym@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Excuse me… we don’t say foreign kids around here… we prefer the term “future veterans of america” thank you very much

    • MJKee9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s utter fucking ridiculous!

      The 12 year old should have had a gun so she could’ve shot the incoming bullet.

      • Case@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What kinda crap is this?

        By 12 they should have a katana and the training to merely cut the bullet in half.

      • What was insane about him?

        He was apparently lucid and intentional. He was just a violent racist that got whipped up by conservative media and politicians, and radicalized to kill Americans.

        Everyone can see this coming from conservative rhetoric and they are proud of it.

        The shooter will probably be posthumously honored at CPAC.

        • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I thought so too, but he had been involuntarily held for mental health crisis for likely just a few days when he was 15, and he wrote a massive fucking manifesto. Stochastic terrorism is real, but I think in that case it affected someone who had screws loose.

          • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Okay, so what gun laws are we changing so that “hateful racists with screws loose” can’t maximize their violence with minimal effort?

            Because if you look back through the parade of mass shooters, the overwhelming majority had both clear warning signs and legal firearms.