Pope Francis condemned the “very strong, organised, reactionary attitude” in the US church and said Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.

Pope Francis has blasted the “backwardness” of some conservatives in the US Catholic Church, saying they have replaced faith with ideology and that a correct understanding of Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.

Francis’ comments were an acknowledgment of the divisions in the US Catholic Church, which has been split between progressives and conservatives who long found support in the doctrinaire papacies of St John Paul II and Benedict XVI, particularly on issues of abortion and same-sex marriage.

  • barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because knowledge is proof and in Christian understanding that would zonk your mind due to god’s purported properties. Think of it like the ultimate high-ball, you’d instantly become a junkie.

    • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What are you even saying? Just a long winded way to say “durrr you no comprehend God’s will cause you silly stupid hoomen”

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean there’s a lot of things I don’t understand, and don’t think I can possibly understand, that are way smaller than how Christians describe god.

        They understand it more like a consequence of physics, as a logically necessary property. Like a fat man jumping on a trampoline full of kids, sure they’re still going to bounce but it won’t be their bouncing, any more.

        • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which is my point, their god if they exist clearly isn’t omnipotent, otherwise the dude could do anything from turning the frequency down to something us wittle itty bitty silly hoomens could understand or vice versa increase our mental aptitude and make us ‘smarter’.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean he did by sending a less fat guy down (the one who got nailed to the cross). But jumping on a trampoline with Jesus doesn’t constitute proof of the whole trinity shebang.

            And yes the whole omnipotence thing breaks down as soon as you try to break logic with it. The Stoic take on that stuff makes a lot more sense: The gods are benevolent and the hardness we suffer is a product of their non-omnipotence, however they gave us that divine spark – reason and wisdom – to be able to get on top of things. They furnished the world to be as perfect as they could, the rest is up to us. Of course for the Stoics philosophy comes first, religion is simply some mythology to tack on afterwards.

            • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean yes that idea has been in many religions since we were shitting on the grass living in huts. Greek mythology, Aztec mythology, Chinese mythology, Japanese mythology all follow similar lines of thought where you try to gain the attention of what ever god you’re seeking favor from by doing X thing(s)(sacrifice of some sort, leave food/drink as offering, slaughtering other gods followers). But even that doesn’t prove anything especially if they were truly benevolent why wouldn’t they reveal themselves? And not just through a human but ACTUALLY reveal themselves.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                But even that doesn’t prove anything especially if they were truly benevolent why wouldn’t they reveal themselves?

                Pagan gods do? I mean it’s all biology/psychology but with plurality still intact instincts can self-portrait as archetypes, thereby more strongly influencing adaptation, seen either in dreams, visions, or projected out onto the world, also other people. The difference to ancestral cults (correctly understood) is merely sorting genetic knowledge (or better put expectations of the world) into categories so it’s easier to spot. Read Freud for the basal instincts, Adler for the social ones, Jung for the actualising ones. Also, Panksepp.

                Also, Thor exists. Proof: Christian churches have lightning rods.

                Oh, thinking of it, that stuff is the one big truth contained in Christianity: The personal god / the priesthood of all believers. The rest is just fucking confused. Meister Eckhart definitely had something but it’s kinda like Buddha trying to teach while avoiding getting burned at the stake so the conceptual framework is rather impenetrable as everything had to be cast into pre-existing doctrine.

                seeking favor from by doing X thing(s)(sacrifice of some sort, leave food/drink as offering, slaughtering other gods followers)

                Symbolic allotting of resources to an instinct, nourishing it, and, erm, pathos. Don’t do the last one that’s mania and gods are perfectly content with you sacrificing some time and mental space, the ritual is for you, not them. In any case if it loses its magic just because you wrap it in a materialist explanation it’s not the real deal, yet you can repeat “I’m doing psychology” as mantra as much as you want when connecting up at that level but it’s still going to feel religious – because that’s the quality of the qualia you see in that area: Magic happens because you didn’t expect things. Otherwise it wouldn’t feel that way, it’s the sound of your mind getting a good knead-through.

                • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  They don’t reveal themselves, no one ever saw the gods and presented definitive proof. it’s always stories conveying that they saw them or as you say “visions in their head”. Guess what, I have a vision in my head of being a billionaire surrounded by a Haram of hot models all wanting to fulfill my every desire. Oh…gee…it’s just a vision and not reality.

                  And you should read up on your gods, there are gods that absolutely want tributes, trinkets, and sacrifices in exchange for favors, hell Satan wants your soul for eternity in exchange for what ever you’ll agree too according to the Christian texts. But whether you get peace or what ever reaction from performing said ritual means nothing to the actual intent of said ritual which is giving tribute to that specific god. Even in Christianity the prevailing belief is by worshipping god you will gain their favor and be granted a place in the magical eternal kingdom of heaven. That in and of itself is paying tribute in a ritual.

                  • barsoap@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    But whether you get peace or what ever reaction from performing said ritual means nothing

                    …to the gods that’s exactly what I said. I get the distinct feeling that you didn’t even read 10% of what I wrote.