Wow this post got popular. I got called into work and didnt see the replies, sorry ladies and gentlemen! Trying to catch up tonight.

  • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    But we have a choice to allow pitbulls as pets. We don’t have much of a choice about the existence of mosquitos.

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which would have far reaching consequences on other insectivores. Also, it’s not a foolproof solution we’ve created, the infertile male mosquitos will reduce the wild populations numbers, but likely not make them extinct.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Once the population dips too low it can’t come back easily, for several reasons.

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But there are a lot of mosquitos, and the infertile males won’t fully displace the healthy male population, so it’s unlikely the population will ever dip too low to drive them to extinction.

      • JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait, does that mean no more mosquitos or can you simply have non-biting mosquitos? Because if the latter then what the fuck are we waiting for?

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You missed the point. You’re basing your assumption on the idea that pit bulls are somehow inherently bad dogs kind of like society treats people of a certain color as if they are inherently criminals.

      The CDC and Humane society are saying that’s an incorrect and poorly supported approach. That’s why they don’t support breed specific bans.

      That’s not to say dog attacks don’t happen. Dogs of any breed can be aggressive. It depends on a lot of factors.

      Here is an example of poodles being aggressive: https://nypost.com/2022/11/14/pack-of-10-poodles-attacks-california-beachgoer-and-her-elderly-corgi-service-dog/

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And yet Pitbulls and pit mixes account for 85% of fatal dog attacks. Poodles account for 0%.

        And studies have shown bad and neglectful owners only account for about 20% of dog attacks, so yeah, pitbulls suck as a breed.

        • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You aren’t citing any studies. Even if you did cite a study, you won’t find one that isn’t based on news reports, and guess what? News reports are problematic because the media likes clickbait and fearmongers in order to get clicks and views, even as far back as the 1970s and 1980s. There is a documented history of the media misidentifying dog breeds, overreporting certain breed attacks, and underreporting others. That means the entire basis of your argument is not based on reality or truth because there is no reliable source. Your views are informed by media narrative that originated in the 1970s and 1980s and that has reinforced itself through folks like you repeating platitudes and anecdotes. It’s the same type of thinking that enforces racism and racist views. Actually, don’t you find it interesting that the same dogs preferred by people of color were painted as vicious beasts by the media? It’s almost like that was intentional.

          Myself, I’d rather listen to experts like those at the CDC or the Humane Society, which dismiss this type of thinking.

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t feel like digging up the study I read a little while back, it was reviewed paper based on hospitalization data for dog bites, and I honestly don’t give a shit if you believe me because nothing will change your mind about that shit breed.

            And pits contaminate every breed they touch, pit mutts are violent unpredictable shits too, and are the result of most of the non-pit attacks out there.

            And fuck off with the racist claims, everyone I know who owns a pit is white as fuck.

    • Tony Smehrik@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have to look at risk, cost, and benefits on all these policy decisions. At some point your efforts are better spent elsewhere.