• Anissem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    183
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    In the US we have legalized gambling commercials now

      • Anissem@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        I don’t know how anyone watches live news with all the drug ads

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            I got my parents set-top boxes with Netflix and cancelled their cable and they still mostly watch broadcast TV, with tons of ads. At this point, I dunno WTF is wrong with them – it’s as if they’re addicted to having the worst experience possible.

            • pufferfisherpowder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              They just don’t want to choose. They want the TV on to fill the silence, not to watch a show. Maybe to watch the “news”.
              Sometimes I miss the days of flow TV, you just turn it on and that’s it. No browsing the catalogue you just get whatever is on.

          • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 days ago

            There’s nothing quite like the experience of watching US tv for the first (and most likely last) time.

            That your broadcast system is still up is a mystery to the rest of us.

            • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 days ago

              You know the Dead Internet theory? Where like 80% of the internet is just bots talking to each other and there are no humans involved?

              American Cable TV has already reached the equivalent of that. It is a vehicle for advertisement. The whole industry is primarily propped up by advertisers in order to have a platform for their advertisements. Hardly any human eyes are on them anymore, because anyone out there who is still watching TV shows is overwhelmingly likely to be watching those shows on Netflix or Hulu. But the ads must flow.

              Mostly the only people who are still seeing these are older folks, who are one of the easiest markets to market to. So there is still, arguably, some value in this. But realistically speaking if you’re advertising on cable TV and your target market is anything other than folks 70+ years old, you’re wasting your time. The whole thing is one big advertiser circlejerk. I believe this is why we now get less than 20 minutes of actual content during a 30-minute programming block. Air time has been shrinking to make room for more ads for a couple decades at least.

        • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 days ago

          I left live-TV behind years ago. I only consider and watch streaming services that offer an ad-free option. Also don’t want my kids to watch all those ads. If we teach the next generation to despise ads, maybe we can change things.

      • Yodan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        15 days ago

        It’s always so weird because it’s not like you can go to your primary doctor and say “I want X drug” right? Like, if there was a reason to give you a drug for something the doctor would have prescribed it. Also not ask you how you felt about them, just that here is X drug for your Y problem. If that doesn’t work we try Z.

        Or do people actually swap doctors over and over for months until they get one who says “ok dude”?

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          14 days ago

          You absolutely can, unless it’s Adderall. For some fucking reason you tell a doctor that you’ve been on Adderall for years and it works better for you than the alternatives you’ve been prescribed in the past and they treat you like a drug seeker instead of someone who’s been treating her adhd for over two decades

        • Darrell_Winfield@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          15 days ago

          The latter is called “doctor shopping” and it absolutely happens.

          The goal of the advertisement is to have the patient be interested, not the doctor. Admittedly some doctors are not up to date on the latest obscure cutting edge treatments, so there is some possible benefit. However, most doctors are capable of performing cost benefit analyses and understanding side effects, but when a patient comes in asking for a medication, it definitely tips the scales towards the medication.

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            14 days ago

            Well, also there are medical sales people / pharma sales reps, usually attractive women, that go to doctors offices, take them out to lunch, and give them a ton of shit like free samples and golf clubs and whatnot. Have the product name recognition out there from the commercial helps with all this.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          I don’t think I’ve ever “asked my doctor about ___” because of something I saw in a commercial.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            15 days ago

            I rejected my medical care provider’s (I think it was a nurse practitioner) advice because of what I saw in an ad, and it did not go well. They were incredibly offended that I had an opinion and dismissive of the idea that IUDs could lead to scarring, which I got from the ad itself. I didn’t end up with any birth control that day, but the next month, planned parenthood gave me the ring instead of a first generation copper IUD.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              14 days ago

              I would have definitely gotten a second opinion via some internet searching on anything I saw in a commercial long before I talked to a doctor about it.

              • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                14 days ago

                Oh, I did do that. I just wouldn’t have looked into it if it weren’t for the advertisement warning.

                I think birth control is in a weird category here though, because it’s (generally) totally elective and there’s a bunch of different kinds that work differently for different people, so it’s probably pretty standard for people to have preferences about it in a way that they probably don’t for various types of, say, cholesterol medication.

    • tehWrapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      14 days ago

      All I see on what my wife watches is gambling and medication commercials that say nothing about what the medication does but that I should ask my doctor if I need it.

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Must be Canada. They’re sort of threading the legal loopholes for drug advertising

    • BatrickPateman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Same in UK / Australia it seems.

      We have an expat TV streaming option at home for the wife and holy fuck bingo ads galore on those channels.

      Also, add for insurance for funeral costs? Wtf?

  • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    14 days ago

    Somehow businesses have managed to convince people it’s normal to waste countless hours of their life listening to someone else tell them what they need to buy so they can be happy and fulfilled. We’re bombarded by it. Radio, TV, internet, social media, busses, billboards, flyers, junk mail, email spam. It’s everywhere. It completely pervades our society and lives. It’s pervasive and it’s anything but normal.

    It’s a sign of a seriously sick culture, and somehow we’ve all become brainwashed and numb to its harmful effects.

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      14 days ago

      You might find Edward Bernays and his impact on advertising interesting.

      One of the numerous problems for America’s magnates was the consumption of the average citizen. Many only purchased what they really needed, a behaviour which moguls wanted to change. The Wall Street banker Paul Mazur summarised this in a particularly straightforward manner: ‘We must shift America from a needs to a desires culture’, he wrote in 1927 in the Harvard Business Review. ‘People must be trained to desire, to want new things even before the old have been entirely consumed.’

      https://www.historytoday.com/miscellanies/original-influencer

      https://www.npr.org/2005/04/22/4612464/freuds-nephew-and-the-origins-of-public-relations

      https://theconversation.com/the-manipulation-of-the-american-mind-edward-bernays-and-the-birth-of-public-relations-44393

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        14 days ago

        Economy goes brrr. He needs a special circle of hell. And perhaps if not him it would have been someone else, but he was the one who brought upon consumerism, planned obsolescence, and the whole “keeping up with the Jones”.

      • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        14 days ago

        Christ on a bike, imagine finding out Goebbels used your methods to murder millions, and you still didn’t realise that you’re a cunt 😬

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      With exceptions of few countries, I believe the modern society is closer to the novel Brave New World than 1984 story. People have been convinced to accept control by way of pleasure. To forget the mundane and realities of life in exchange for gratification by constant triggering of our own biochemistry that induces the feeling of pleasure. We are encouraged buy the things we don’t need to impress the people we don’t like, so that consumer spending will keep the all-mighty economy kept being fed. But if we complain that we don’t have enough left for essentials, then we are told it’s because we keep buying iPhone or avocado toast. The media will say that the economy is slowing down because of less consumer spending, but then chastise us for doing the exact same thing we are told to do: spend and spend.

    • dreikelvin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 days ago

      Imagine a generation of people centering even their nostalgia around commercial products instead of interpersonal relationships and life experiences. Those things are replaced by products that are becoming crucial to creating it, like game consoles, commercials, printed media - just abysmal

      • phlegmy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        What’s abysmal?

        People are going to have nostalgia for the the things they grew up with.
        The house you grew up in, your neighbourhood, the school you went to, tv shows, games, whatever.

        These things don’t replace nostalgia for interpersonal relationships and life experiences, they supplement them.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        I put on a Youtube channel of 80’s commercials as a pre-roll before a scheduled meeting, it was wildly popular

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          There are a few channels that will run 8-10 hour Sunday morning cartoon compliations with commercials included. For some reason I really like those even when I hate almost all other ads.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      It completely pervades our society and lives. It’s pervasive and it’s anything but normal.

      perverts. it’s perverted. a more fitting word.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      It okay

      If they can afford advertising then their product is overpriced and not worth your time

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 days ago

      Please also include all the bullshit random toys, card games, loot boxes, and other garbage people like to pretend are not gambling.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      So recently our local government relaxed the rules on sports betting / advertising. It’s now everywhere. When you go to see our local MLB team the stadium is coated in bright LEDs advertising bet dot com.

    • ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Now gambling firms have ads that tell you not to use them.

      I’m wouldn’t mind if it was “you have increased your limit once today, you can’t do that for 48 hours now” then 60, then 120, or something. But no, it’s just “set limits”, that you can change whenever you want…

    • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Just in case it’s not obvious, they mean an English muffin, a kind of flat bread roll. In the UK that’s what they sell for breakfast at McDonald’s (sausage and egg, bacon and egg etc).

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        You know, this is the first time I’ve witnessed a country refer to something we call [country] [thing] as just [thing]

        • Zahille7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          A sausage and egg McMuffin does not look like a muffin. It actually does look like an English muffin because that’s what it is.

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 days ago

            Oh course the McMuffin is served on a muffin. But when I just hear “muffin” by itself I don’t think of the sandwich including sausage and egg and cheese and whatnot. You have to actually say “McMuffin” to conjure that image. Otherwise I just think of a plain English muffin.

            It would be like if they said they were banning advertisements for buns. While a hamburger is typically served on a bun, just saying bun alone doesn’t really include the entire sandwich. I could serve a hamburger in a lettuce wrap, or on sliced sourdough or something other than a bun. If McDonald’s served their sausage and egg on a lettuce wrap, would that circumvent this ad ban?

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 days ago

        Oooh right of course. I’ve not had a maccies breakfast in a while and kinda forgot. Most breakfast places I’ve ever been to just sell “baps”, “rolls” or “butties” even if they end up serving it on a muffin roll

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Lol. Most English people don’t even know what an English Muffin is, they are less common there then they are in the US.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            They are an American invention and are way more popular here than in England. They exist in England, they are marketed as “muffins”, but they aren’t terribly popular.

            (Finding English muffin sales data is harder then I had expected.)

            • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              14 days ago

              I’m English, I assure you people here eat them all the time!

              Are you sure they were invented in America? That seems very unlikely to be true so I googled it, wikipedia says recipes for muffins appeared as early as 1747 in English cookbooks…

              • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 days ago

                I think the sourdough variety had a popular brand started in San Francisco in the early to mid 1900s, I think sometimes that gets mixed up with being the first instead of being a popular version that wasn’t really available elsewhere to Americans last century.

              • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                You know, after further research I am now second guessing myself. It’s something I have always been told, and half of it is from family who were living in England saying that almost nobody eats them.

                Now I am wondering if my assertion is only based on half facts and anecdotal evidence.

                As for the invention itself, I can only find evidence of vague recipes that don’t seem to representative of the English muffin we know today.

  • mtchristo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    Next, they will make healthy food affordable, right ? Right ???

  • DreamButt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    Finally. It always baffeed me that it’s legal to advertise bread covered sugar to children

  • Bob@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Odd to hear of old Blighty coming out with a level-headed policy after the last decade or so of wank governance.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 days ago

    What’s wrong with muffins? Meh, who cares. Muffins sell themselves by being muffins.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yes it does. It’s only offered on an irregular basis, so for the people that would only go to McDonald’s for the McRib, and no other item, would need to be notified when it’s available.

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    You can’t advertise a burger during the day? To protect kids health? Weird

    • phlegmy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yeah I thought so too. You don’t have to buy your kid anything they ask for, it’s your job as a parent to set boundaries.
      Unless they’re trying to make the parents think of burgers less often, so they’re less likely to buy crap for their kids.
      Either way, it seems like the government is doing your parenting for you.

    • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I mean you shouldn’t be advertising dead animals in general as far as I’m concerned, it’s not good for the animals, us, nor the planet. ¯_(ツ)_/¯