Not sure if this is the correct place to post, but I just wanna kinda rant a bit.

I’m not the only one that hates this, right?

An app can just do a “This App Does Not Allow Screenshots”? Like… wtf?

Like, its my phone, and some app can just decide to disable a fuction of my phone. It’s my phone and if I wanna take a screenshot, I’m taking a screenshot. I don’t care about whatever “security” the app developer wants.

Imagine if every online shopping app whether fast food or amazon, just used this to block you from taking a screenshot so you can’t save the records in case of a dispute.

Which android developer thought it was a good idea to let an app disable a function on your phone. Even iPhone doesn’t have this stupid concept.

Sorry for the rant.

Anyone wanna share your stories?

(P.S. I have a cheap secondary phone to take photos of the screen. “This App Does Not Allow Screenshots” my ass lmao, I’m taking the screenshot whether the app wants it or not.

  • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    You can root your phone to remove all security features, if you don’t mind malware having full access to your data. You should probably cancel your debit and credit cards if you do, and lock your credit score, cause if you’re doing stuff like that you won’t have to wait long till Have I Been Pwned notifies you you’re in a data breach.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Many (maybe even all) banking apps won’t even install or launch if your phone is rooted.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yea… I though about rooting, but heck no, too much security problem, I don’t want more anxiety. Guess I’ll just have to keep use my cheap secondary phone to take pictures as a workaround… 😓

    • ouch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Of course. When you run a monopoly, you get to make your own rules.

      EU should force Google to open Android back up.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t have much to add other than my agreement. They’ve been tightening the noose around our necks little by little for years now. But don’t worry, screenshots and copying and pasting text will return…as a microsubscription! /s

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        A better way to handle that would be for “taking screenshots when other apps have focus” to be a special permission that needs to be explicitly granted. Could even make it app specific (ie, “I allow app x to take screenshots or record the display/audio of apps y and z”).

        Just like arbitrary apps shouldn’t have access to look at the clipboard or full file system whenever they want.

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Good idea for a finance app (which could helpfully ask me for a confirmation) - but sloppy as a general justification for dictating what a user can or can’t do. (But go off I guess)

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    You can bypass this crap, but you’ll need to root your phone to achieve that.

    Afterwards you’ll need to install magisk (superuser app) and a bunch of plugins: play integrity fix and playcurl_next (to simulate that your phone is unrooted), and then FlagSecurePatcher (which is the actual module that’s overriding the screenshot block.

      • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you root your phone, you give root access to any malware you run across as well. So don’t use your phone for anything that you don’t want to end up on some darkweb forum.

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Rubbish, the superuser app will prompt you if an app asks for permissions, and you need to grant it manually. The warning message is distinctively different from regular popups, and there is a 5 second cooldown timer before you can click it, to make sure it’s not happening accidentally.

      • serenissi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Many phones can work in usb host mode. I’ll see if such a rooted phone can be used to capture screen over adb with perhaps a modified scrcpy. Or run normal scrcpy in a freedesktop rootfs container. Sounds like a fun side project.

        • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          When I first was researching scrcpy, I found a thread (probably under “issues” on the GitHub repository for scrcpy) where someone else requested the same. They then went on to create a prototype using Java that the author of scrcpy seemed impressed with, but that was as far as it went. The prototype was based on a very old version (1.x) of scrcpy, so I never bothered trying it. Might be usable for this purpose, however.

      • Kitathalla@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I remember one (snapchat maybe?) that couldn’t block it so it just alerted the other person you took the screenshot. Maybe it’s changed in a decade.

      • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You can’t screen shot in streaming apps like Netflix and Disney. When you do the resulting image is just a black screen

        • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I find this shit hilarious.

          Who the fuck is pirating a damn thing by screen shotting their phone? Can I smash the buttons 30 times a second in order to be able to reproduce the movie? No, absolutely not.

          In reality, people will be taking a screen shot in order to share something, giving free publicity to Netflix. So what actually happens is that I torrent the thing I want to make a gif of, or share a frame from, thereby leaving an incentive for the people who provide the torrents to keep on keeping on.

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You can hit “take screenshot” but it results in a black frame iirc. Same for screen record.

        • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I know Netflix has/had this if you video recorded. I thought I found a great way to download shows/movies until it was just a black screen.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I get banking and financial apps doing it. But shopping apps yea, wish we had a permissions override

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Like, its my phone, and some app can just decide to disable a fuction of my phone.

    Is it your phone though?

    • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Your physical phone hardware belongs to you.

      The Android operating system is licensed for your use as Free and Open Source Software.

      All the other Google bits and blobs are licensed to you by Google.

      Some days I’m not even sure if I own the shoes on my feet or if they’re just licensed to me.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, and we should not give app developers a free pass because “everybody is doing it”.

  • Stomata@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This thing is super annoying. Maybe there is some xposed module to bypass this . i don’t known my phone isn’t rooted.

  • TheOrcWhoWrites@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Some android apps bypass this but don’t work 100 percent but sadly, they are the only safe option.

    By safe I also mean, the others you must root so you void certain updates from your carrier in many cases, you have to search the APK code and delete a line, or you have to install a certain entity which hinders your security in other ways.

    Shopping apps should have, and Amazon usually lets you email a copy of a receipt anyway. Don’t know about other shopping apps. Banks and other financial institutions you would just need to contact them for records etc, and I know it is a pain.

    Some browsers have settings to bypass if you are using a site that tries to stop a screenshot.

  • Bezier@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The point of many of android’s “protection” features isn’t to protect the user from apps, but to protect apps from the user. I hate it.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Being able to block screenshots is “supposed” to protect users from having malware take screenshots of banking apps and other such information.

      If app developers were good, this could have been a good feature.

      But I agree with OP. It still should be the user’s choice.

      • Klajan@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        My Banking App does have the option to disable this feature.

        It’s all fine if it’s a user choice, very annoying if it’s not.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Protections” are fine, as long as there’s an override for it.

      User doesn’t like potential malware from “sideloading”? Then don’t enable “Install from Unknown Sources”.

      Same thing with everything else, there should be an override switch.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        yeah just like with mounting EFI vars on linux…

        it should be possible because “root can do anything, really”, but also, it’s dangerous and should be disabled by default.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      In this case, I think it’s protecting apps from other apps. No secret screen recording going on while you’re looking at bank statements, etc. I find that annoying, too, but I’m less annoyed by the reasoning in this case.

      Now if Google could explain why toggling wifi through Tasker requires root, I would LOVE to hear the reasoning…

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Third-party apps, unless a user specifically go to settings and find that option, don’t have the permission known as “Draw Over Top” that’s required to do screen recordings/screenshots.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Fair enough, though experience with my unsavvy family makes me think a lot of people will do whatever an app tells them to do

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Now if Google could explain why toggling wifi through Tasker requires root, I would LOVE to hear the reasoning…

        tbf all hardware-functions require root permission by default.

        Linux does the same thing. If you want to access /dev/sda, it requires root.

        I could guess one of the ways it could interfere with security is that it would probably also allow the app to disable WiFi. If the app does that, it could incur costs as now data is being transmitted over mobile connectivity. Also, it would maybe allow the app to find your mobile-IP address, which could be used to geotrack you. But i don’t know, i’m just talking out of my ass here.

      • Jiří Král@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        In this case, I think it’s protecting apps from other apps. No secret screen recording going on while you’re looking at bank statements, etc.

        I think with all the engineers at Google developing Android they could come up with a solution of how to discern whether the act of screenshot was triggered solely by the user, or an app on the phone. They are the ones in power of all the APIs that allow other apps to capture the screen content in the first place. Maybe I am simplifying it too much, but this seems as a bad excuse to me.

        Maybe it would be too hard of a solution since there’s so many ways third party apps could capture screen content (including for example the Android accessibility service which also allows apps to read content of the screen and even simulate screen touches and gestures which many automation apps make use of) that blocking the screenshot alltogether is by far the most feasible solution.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          There is already a solution:

          Third-party apps, unless a user specifically go to settings and find that option, don’t have the permission known as “Draw Over Top” that’s required to do screen recordings/screenshots.

          So by default, a user is already safe from a malicious app trying to steal info. (That is, unless they just be an idiot and give the app “Draw Over Top” permission)

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            the permission known as “Draw Over Top” that’s required to do screen recordings/screenshots.

            That’s not exactly intuitive. I had no idea that permission would allow an app to take screenshots. The warnings given on the permission screen mention other risks, but not that one.

            • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Well you are gonna be trusting the password manager anyways, since its literally storing all your passwords. If you trust Bitwarden to store all your passwords, then you can trust it to not abuse the “Draw Over Top” permission.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          For me and my family, I think the best solution would be to leave it as-is but with a way to lift the restrictions for power users that doesn’t involve root access. Something akin to enabling developer mode without having to buy a specific rootable phone

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The first two don’t bug me but dam, give me my 6 buttons back!! I hate these fat notification tray icons. And yes, fuck Google for making it take MORE clicks to toggle wifi/cellular than before.

          • Spectrism@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Unless they changed something in Android 15, which I haven’t been able to try yet, I don’t think the separate WiFi / Mobile Data tiles were ever removed. At least they still exist on LineageOS 21 (Android 14), just hidden in the tile editor. You might want to check if you still have them there.

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                That’s probably your mobile connection? Are you translating or does an English android say “Internet”?

                What’s the symbol?

                There’s also an option you can turn on that allows you pulling the menu down from the right side of the top of the screen, and you get the whole menu. I tried linking but for some reason I haven’t been able to upload images with my new phones for some reason. And then pulling down from the left side will just bring down the normal menu.

                You can also reorganise the tiles so you have your most used in the quick bar.

                • glimse@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  It literally says “Internet” and is for both wifi and cellular data. You click it and the popup shows toggles for both along with available wifi networks and while I have organized the tiles so Internet is the first option, there is no option to separate the two. Airplane Mode is a separate tile

                  Pixel 7 Pro with Android 15

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        They changed it the other day where airplane mode doesn’t require root. That one’s nice for me.

        Never mind that shortcuts on iOS has been able to do that simple task from its inception.

      • dingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Ok but why is my browser doing this in incognito mode? Incognito mode isn’t a banking app. It’s me not wanting my browser to save my Facebook login info or history.

        • kn33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The target use case for incognito mode is to prevent the device from saving your activity during the browsing session through things like cookies and history. To that end, incognito also blocks it to prevent other apps from saving your activity through screen recordings or screenshots.

  • QualifiedKitten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Drives me nuts too! Signal at least has a toggle for it, so the user can decide. I wish more apps would do the same, maybe with a pop up warning explaining the risks.

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The only apps where this makes any sense are dating apps and similar social apps where a level of social vulnerability is more likely.

    Otherwise agree that all others are BS.