• xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    201
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a lot of questions about different parts of this title that I don’t understand, but I support him.

    • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      127
      ·
      1 year ago

      Marc Tyler Nobleman was supposed to talk to kids about the secret co-creator of Batman, with the aim of inspiring young students in suburban Atlanta’s Forsyth County to research and write.

      Then the school district told him he had to cut a key point from his presentation — that the artist he helped rescue from obscurity had a gay son. Rather than acquiesce, he canceled the last of his talks.

      • Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        First of all thank you for saving a click. Secondly, Marc Tyler Nobleman is not just a Batman researcher, he is a symbol. What an absolute Chad.

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Would he have said the artist had a ‘straight’ son? Or is it just a son in that case?

              • DLSchichtl@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                You are deflecting from the conversation by “what about”-ing the straights. This conversation isn’t about his son being straight. The straight kids can have a place in this conversation when people start trying to criminalize their very existence.

                • bobman@unilem.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You misunderstand.

                  I’m highlighting how the son’s sexual orientation would likely not be brought up if he was straight, unless it was relevant to the story at hand.

                  Mentioning someone is gay just because they’re gay is focusing on their sexual orientation for no good reason, just pointing out that they’re ‘different’ and need to be acknowledge as such.