• Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 days ago

    I get that there was basically no chance that a sitting president was going to jail. But it’s not like making him pay a fine would have caused a constitutional crisis.

    About the only good thing I can say about this is that it’s at least being honest about the complete lack of consequences.

    • qantravon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If he had been fined, do you think he’d actually pay it? And what then? You can’t stick him in jail to make him pay it.

      I think this was the real reason behind the decision. Any governmental punishment is ultimately backed by a threat of jail/prison for non-compliance, but if you can’t do that to the president, then he can just ignore it anyway.

      • Hylactor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        As it is he is now required as a felon in NY to submit a DNA sample, which I am very doubtful he will do. Aint no way they’re going to he able to get him to even give up spit. So yeah, no way he would have given up actual money.

        As a side note, if somehow he does submit a sample, imagine the chaos if the database got a hit on an open case. Absolute fantasy fodder, I know, but man would that be sweet.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It could just be that the fine would have been disturbingly low, and by fining that amount it would actually be more embarrassing than waving their hands and saying no punishment for supreme leader.