• 30mag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Obviously something unexpected could happen that blindsides the Party, but it looks like politics is in command and everything is proceeding as expected.

    I take it you didn’t read the article.

    A former Chinese government official said the country’s entire population of 1.4 billion wouldn’t be enough to fill all of its empty houses, Reuters reported, citing a video from the state news agency China News Service. China’s real-estate struggles rose to prominence in 2021, when industry giant Evergrande became the most indebted company in the world and defaulted. At the time, there were at least 65 million vacant properties in the country, which would have been enough to house the entire population of France, Insider previously reported.

    To me, this seems wasteful. I’m not very familiar with the Chinese real estate market however.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      There should always be a reserve supply of vacant properties to give people freedom of movement between regions and cities.

      • 30mag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This might be overkill:

        At the time, there were at least 65 million vacant properties in the country, which would have been enough to house the entire population of France, Insider previously reported.

        • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          65M is what percentage of 1.4Bn? It’s about 5%.

          5% oversupply is pretty reasonable, especially given that the housing isn’t fungible and the populations are more mobile than the houses are.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          That doesn’t actually mean there are 65 million surplus properties. A vacant house isn’t an unnecessary house. Children move out all the time, families sometimes break up, Chinese citizens currently living overseas or in Europe return home, etc.

          I bet there’s actually math for this - I wonder if anyone has calculated the optimal amount of vacancies?

          • 30mag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That doesn’t actually mean there are 65 million surplus properties. A vacant house isn’t an unnecessary house.

            That is a very good point. I still find it hard to believe that they are making the best use of labor and materials with situations like this:

            Ordos, near the border with Mongolia, was meant to hold over 1 million people and become a cultural and economic hub. But by 2016, its population was only around 100,000, and it has been described as “the largest ghost town in the world.”

            • zephyreks@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sometimes, you misspeculate. Some developers lost a whole fuck ton of money on the project, but that’s more than made up for if you can turn a profit on projects near big cities (which demand is still sky high for).

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              I still find it hard to believe that they are making the best use of labor and materials

              Is anyone? If I have to choose between “housing shortage” and “housing surplus” I know which society I would prefer.

              • 30mag@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sure. The point I was trying to make is that society might be better served by allocating resources to building hospitals or schools or something the community needs instead of housing that the community does not necessarily need because there is already a surplus of housing.

                • zephyreks@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  China isn’t really limited by construction resources. There’s a heavier constraint in terms of hospital staff and teachers than there is on construction resources.

                  • 30mag@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    China isn’t really limited by construction resources.

                    Maybe they aren’t running out of concrete and steel, but they are taking out loans for these construction projects.