• Big P@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think so. People still have a need for interaction with a real human and infinite generated content just feels hollow. Sure, it’ll satisfy some people and maybe that’s a good thing but I don’t think it’s going to replace or even barely supplement real social interaction

    • BurningnnTree@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it will happen. Multiplayer video games already match people with bots that are presented as if they were human players, and 99.9% of players don’t care. As long as a game makes you feel like you’re playing against other humans, most people consider that good enough. Similarly, as long as a bot on Instagram or Twitter feels human enough to be enjoyable to interact with, users won’t care that they aren’t actually human.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It depends much on the game, environment, people involved.

        Npc ai has come a far way and the thrill of playing live with people is a real competition. And its only just started to get good enough to intimidate social/emotional behavior.

        • massive realistic single player historic events, like battlefields - yay

        • the social aspect of social media and online comments - nah

        • front and helpdesk assistants, maybe even a certified therapist ai - yea

        • friends/family - cant

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it will on a broad scale, but some percentage of people will fall victim to it. It’s just like how only 1% of mobile gamers pay for anything but the percent that does pays a LOT.