• peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    People now realise that kids are a lot of hard work and fucking expensive…and that yearly skiing holidays are fun.

  • Shou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m sure artificially lowering female med student’s grades to increase drop-outs amoung women will help with the financial stability and job security needed to raise a child!

  • ItsJaaaaane (She/Her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I love Japan, but I will say it has its issues that often get overlooked. Workplace culture is horrific in Japan and it contributes to their high suicide rates. There’s even a word in Japanese that specifically refers to a person dying from being overworked. I know friends who immigrated to Japan, only to regret it because they saw for themselves just how harsh the workplace culture was. Japanese people have no time for their family. Something must change or this problem is going to get worse but given it’s a highly conservative culture I’m not sure it’s going to see changes anytime soon.

  • rekabis@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    In the context of Capitalism, sure, Japan is in trouble.

    But then again, any system that demands infinite growth within a finite system has a biological parallel… in cancer. Yes, capitalism is economic cancer.

    Japan has a bright future in front of it, if it can successfully pioneer an effective degrowth system that prioritizes the lives of people over Paraiste-Class profits.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    As an American (or at least a non Japanese native) if my boss came up to me yelling and swearing in my face I would punch him out cold.

    Actually if more Japanese did this I think things would improve at the office.

  • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    No one has time for family in Japan

    When I watch yt videos about people leaving the workplace at 10pm, I wonder how suicide rate isn’t way higher

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    19 hours ago

    You can tell capitalism is super efficient and sustainable by how it totally collapses without fresh babies to sacrifice.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Thing is, we don’t really know what’s the reason for the current worldwide trend in much, much lower natality rate. We’ve observed in rich countries and poor countries, religious and atheist countries, capitalist and communist countries (both USSR and PRC, who have had very different economic systems), in countries with no safety nets but also in countries with large social programs, in western countries, but also in eastern countries.

      The only thing I can think of these days is education level. Is it possible that education is inversely correlated with natality rates? Or maybe women in the workforce. I’m not arguing for either point, I’m just thinking about what the cause of a world-wide issue might be, because it’s happening everywhere and seemingly without any clear common cause.

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t think any social/political structure would survive without a birth rate

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Which is why, in the U.S., the rich are turning back abortion rights and access to birth control, and gutting our public education. They could, instead, work to build a country where people felt safe, and supported–healthcare, jobs with decent wages, education, etc.–but the filthy rich are psychopaths who care only about themselves, and will do nothing that costs them money, power, and control. Instead, they’ll GLADLY watch the people (people they depend, incidentally, for what good is power and control, if there’s no one to wield it over?) suffer at great levels in attempts to achieve their goals.

      It takes a lot of poor people to make one filthy rich person.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I mean, any system collapses if you don’t have the people to actively participate in it.

      I’m not saying that as a defense of capitalism, more so as pointing out how dumb your comment is.

    • golli@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Lets see how China handles it down the road before we mark this one a problem of one specific system, rather than just humans seemingly sucking in sustainable long term planning on large scales in general.

    • SwordOfOtto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Well, if you prioritize shareholder growth, before Support of children and make sure people have to work super hard to be able to sustain themselves and can’t afford to have a family… Then you should not be supervised that you don’t have any babies in the country

  • hellerphant@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I live and work in Japan, and it definitely is not a very condusive environment for younger Japanese people to have children. My wife and I are both foreigners, and we are in out late 30’s and just had our first. The country has some really great benefits and support services for having children, but we definitely would not be able to do this if we worked for Japanese companies, and with the Japanese work mentality.

    While it IS getting better, work being the central pillar of life and the expectations from the older generations are still very much a thing. The long hours of paper pushing, the culture of promotion based on age and time served rather than innovation and hard work takes a toll on people. If you are not living in the office in your 20s to show your dedication, you are looked down upon, at least accoridng to my Japanese friends.

    Immigration could help fix some of this. Japan is a desireable, largely affordable country, that is safe when it comes to raising children. Living here as a foreigner though has specific challenges, and your job prospects are pretty poor unless you are lucky, and access to housing and just general living can be challenging, even if you can speak Japanese.

    I just got a new job in Kyoto, and I currently live in Tokyo. I would say around 40% of the houses we applied to look at would not even let us see the properties because we are foreigners. That’s 100% legal and totally ok to say here, and I take that in stride. In Australia (where I am from), they would either just tell you to piss off, or show you the property knowing you don’t have a chance, so at least they are upfront about it here I guess. Getting a credit card is a massive ordeal, which you kinda need here because debit cards are increasingly hard to find, and they don’t even work for all bills and systems, and getting a bank account … it all just snowballs.

    Also anything outside of the major cities is kinda dead. I love it, but living and thriving there in places that have more space that would probably promote having big families, is nearly impossible, or at least impossibly boring. This is not unique to Japan, Australia is largely the same outside of the main cities.

    Not sure what the fix is. But annecdotally I see these articles all the time, and yet there are kids and younger families always around, so not sure if it is as serious as they are saying, or more media hype?

    • osugi_sakae@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Lived in Japan for many years, came back to the USA for many of the reasons you touch on. I knew a few foreigners who had non-English-teacher type jobs, but mostly, it was English teacher or English juku owner. The systemic issues, for young Japanese and for foreigners, in Japan really need to be dealt with if they have any hope of slowing their population decline. So, not going to happen.

      Japan is never going to have enough immigration to significantly impact the population decline. Even back in the early 2000s, it would have taken millions of immigrants a year. Now, forget about it.

      Living in inaka is not bad but not great either, for most people. So, tiny apartments in or near big cities or large houses in the middle of nowhere are pretty much the choices. Jobs in inaka? Fisherman, elderly care, sakaya, maybe some other generic retail for the eldest sons who couldn’t escape. And, of course, government jobs.

      Re: media hype, yes there are still young people. But not enough. Societies need 2.1(-ish) children per couple to maintain population equilibrium. Japan, South Korea, Italy, and several other wealthy nations are way below that. Add in the Japanese propensity to live for a long time, and Logan’s Run becomes more and more thinkable each year. When the population pyramid becomes whatever shape parallel lines || are, the economics of a modern, wealthy society break down.

      I gave a PD session for Japanese teachers back in like 2004 or so about why learning English would be helpful, because they might end up with a lot of immigrant children in their classes. (Or, I didn’t say, because you could use your English skills to look for jobs outside of Japan.) Of course, immigration barely happened, and many of those teachers are probably close to retirement age by now. So, my bad, I guess. Someone should do that PD today, because the situation is even worse now.

      • hellerphant@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I am lucky enough to not have an English teaching job, and never have. But unless you are highly specialized, or somehow manage to start your own thing here, there seems to be limite scope as a foreigner to really have a strong career.

        I am actually moving to Shiga Prefecture in a few days. It’s going to be a big change from living on the outskirts of Tokyo for the past six years. Excited to see how my perception of life in Japan changes from the move.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’ve always had this silly dream of running a large, wealthy tech company, and attempting a startup in Japan, not reliant on business with other Japanese companies, that promotes a healthier work culture, and then stuffs the high productivity results in the faces of other companies. As a stretch goal, it could even locate out in the burbs, with an investment in better infrastructure access.

      Japan has so many great things about it, but the major points around banking, sexism, and seniority really twist the image.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Its hyped by FT and more economy driven outlets because it makes them nervous. The replacement rate of births was always enough to support retirement pension plans. Now it’s not.

      Japan is way ahead of the curve on this inevitable trend than other countries so it will be really interesting see how it adjusts and what markets are affected by this.

      In terms of buying a house, is remote work really not a thing in Japan? Living in a remote village sounds lime a dream. Otherwise, are there no towns/villages where foreigners sort of band together and are allowed to buy property? Just curious about how Japan functions

      • Lyrl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Part of my YouTube diet is English-speaking expat YouTubers who live in Japan (UK, US, Canada, Australia), and just based on what they have shared there are some firms that specialize in property searches by foreigners. Not like “buy up a Japanese town and make it Australian”, just networking with more open-to-foreigner Japanese, and being an interface with foreigners to help them learn to integrate.

        Like everywhere in the world, remote villages in Japan lack services. From restaurants to health care to home supplies, it’s more time consuming and expensive to get some things, and others are just not available. From the YouTubers I watch, the community connections enabled by the great mass transit and walkable urban areas in much of Japan (though not all - some parts ate the car-centric pill) are what keep them there, and the friction to maintaining friendships from a rural area has pushed several to move to Tokyo.

        As far as “how is Japan adjusting” to population decline, elder care sucks. A lot of people die alone unnoticed (kodokushi). Markets adjust to lower supply of workers (Japan is at the cutting edge of automation), but quality of life for seniors can’t be automated.

  • Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I believe Japan has less inequality than the US. Not sure on that, but I think it’s true. I think in this case we see work culture playing a role. The only country in the world with a worse work culture than the US is Japan. No one has time to even think about having kids when you are a company man there. It’s similar in the US.

    • mechoman444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It really is. In the US I mean. I work 6 days a week 9 am till whenever the fuck I’m done. Sometimes at 1pm and some nights I’m not home by 7pm.

      Luckily I’ve negotiated less work orders on Saturday later in the morning so I have some kind of decline of work towards the end of the week. It took six years of constant work to get even that. Otherwise it’s 7 work orders a day and I drive around 150 miles a day. (I work in household appliance repair. So I travel from home to home.)

      It’s a thankless job I get micromanaged in. The only advantage I have is that appliance repair techs are always in high demand because there’s so few of us and I’m good at my job so my boss can’t really fire me.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      This is why we need to do something now. Japan has been unable to offer enough of the right incentives to turn their birthrate around so how do we do any better? Act now. They waited until they had a problem before trying to turn it around and it hasn’t worked. Social and economic inertia is very difficult to turn but maybe if we start now, we can have different results. Japan never had much immigration to fall back on but we can use that to buy more time. We have a chance as long as we keep encouraging and welcoming immigration…… shit

      • Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’d be more interested in altering the material conditions that lead to low birth rates than relying on churning through the global population. We’re already doing immigration like you said and have been. It still sucks to live in these conditions.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Even as economist talk about the Lost Decade (really, two decades) in Japan, the unemployment rate has always been relatively subdued compared to the US:

      https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LRUN25TTJPA156N

      From about 1.7% in 1990, and then two spikes that just about reach 5.0% in 2002 and 2009. Not only that, but that’s the range for people 25-54 years old, which isn’t equivalent to the headline number typical in the US. There is an equivalent in published US data, and you can see it’s much higher and spikier than Japan:

      https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS14000060

      This doesn’t mean everything is OK for the working class in Japan. Housing prices are astronomical, requiring 100 year multi-generational loans. Working culture is also far more stressful. However, I think it’s fair to ask who the “Lost (two) Decades” is really affecting.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        requiring 100 year multi-generational loans

        This is the first I’ve heard of this and the fact that it’s real is insane to me.

        • NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Because it’s BS. It’s glaringly fake and calls into question the rest of the claims of the post.

          Housing prices aren’t even insane, especially outside of Tokyo. And the property prices don’t even go up. AND you can get 35 year housing loans at under 1% interest. The main reason housing prices have gone up at all is that construction materials cost have gone up due to inflation, Ukraine war, covid supply and demand issues.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I guess it works pretty differently to our system where you borrow x money at y interest rate then? Because otherwise a slight interest rate change has a huge impact, or paying slightly more back would reduce the time to pay it by decades.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The only country in the world with a worse work culture than the US is Japan.

      China too.

    • Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The only country in the world with a worse work culture than the US is Japan

      What about North Korea?

      • Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Not really relevant. I mean technically there are countries with child slavery so I guess if you want to entirely miss the point on purpose you could go with one of those.

        • Emerald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I wasn’t really being serious, I knew you were talking about developed nations.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        You mean The People’s Republic of Korea? They’re a communist utopia, aren’t they? /S

  • 0101100101@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This problem is not isolated to Japan. Countries all across the world are facing the same issue and have been for a number of years.

    Create a shitty, miserable, society with no rights or support, and people do not want to bring children into it… who’d guess?

    The flannel has been wrung dry to the detriment of the working class; there is no where to go, no more water to squeeze from them. This is global society / capitalism falling apart.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly its not some mysterious problem no matter how much the government and media try to frame it as one, people of the age to have kids have no time for kids and no money for kids so no wonder they have no desire for kids.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      Even if they did want children, without the support systems, it may not be feasible for them to have kids. Having them might mean choosing to starve or go without a house.

      Even if you’re in a country with a public health care system, a sick/young child means having to take time off work to care for them.

      • 0101100101@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        Isn’t it interesting that the more “developed” countries have the lowest birth rates.

        • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          It’s what follows education. It’s the largely uneducated areas of the world that still raw dog like there’s no tomorrow.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            Solid racism. Even if your correlation is “accurate” (according to imperial definitions/measurements of “education”), that’s not causation.

            People also tend to have more kids when the life expectancy of their kids if very low. Colonized people have low life expectancy because their labor and resources are exploited by the privileged.

            • osugi_sakae@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 hours ago

              My understanding is that lower fertility follows higher female education for several reasons, including that women in school - and with access to birth control - prefer to wait until finishing school and starting a career before having children. Countries where women have fewer educational and fewer career opportunities, people often start having babies sooner, and more babies overall.

              Another oft-mentioned factor is social safety nets such as social security (as much as that can count as a safety net). Areas with no or weak elder support outside of the family tend to have bigger families. Shockingly, this was also the case in the “developed” world back before they developed. Ask older adults in the USA how many brothers and sisters their grandparents had and it is probably a lot more than the next generation had, and the next, etc.

              Do colonized people have lower life expectancy or do their children? Or both? Certainly, exploited people may also be living in (and unable to escape from) a society with poor elder care and insufficient safety nets such as social security or other retirement options. Which, of course, makes having lots of kids a totally rational decision. And also limits the ability of many women to participate in the economy outside of the home, which can also slow the development of the country / area’s economy.

          • 0101100101@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            20 hours ago

            So apparently under Sharia law, Muslim men can have anal sex with a girl under 8, and vaginal with a girl over 8.

    • Priditri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Capitalism is the best we’ve got. Even North Korea has acknowledged this. With other systems people starve en masse. My hope is that we get over the taboo of regulation. Capitalism fucks up real-estate and wealth distribution. And health-care should 100% be government funded.

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Seems super likely that capitalism is going to be a major factor in our extinction. Maybe we could have a bit less of it and actually survive as a species

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        It seems like you already understand some of the limitations of capitalism. Look into why regulation has gradually been rolled back in the US since the 70s. Why did politicians start to agree with corporate execs demands for lower regulation. Keywords to look up - regulatory capture.

        On a separate point, there’s plenty of famines that have occurred in capitalist economies due to capitalist exploitation - that is make more money, at the cost of of creating a famine. Some estimates put the deaths due to famines under capitalism higher than those under socialism. I used to simply know only of the famines under socialism and not know of the famines under capitalism.

        Finally the capitalism we live in since the Great Depression is significantly different than the capitalism before it. Socialists, actual Marxists in western counties, yes the US included, were actively involved in the policies that created the welfare states across the west along with the regulatory regime. Some of FDR’s economic advisors were Marxian economists.

        That was the compromise to save capitalism from imminent worker revolution. The unregulated, no-safety-net version of the system had lead to the conditions for such revolution. The socialist policies that averted the revolution in have slowly been dismantled over time and the system is reverting to the pre-Great Depression state. Faster in some countries than others.

        If you want to reform capitalism to the point where it can no longer revert to economic liberalism (free market fundamentalism), you’d have to almost completely eliminate wealth accumulation. You could only do that by changing the ownership of the means of production. E.g. all employees in all corporations become equal owners (or controllers) of the machines and therefore the decisions on sharing the wealth those machines produce, instead of those decisions being made by a tiny number of major shareholders. You’d also have to significantly expand the industries operated by the government. At that point you end up with socialism. And yes socialism doesn’t mean central planning and no markets. Capitalism doesn’t mean no central planning and just markets. We do plenty of central planning in capitalist economies across governments and large corporations.

        I’m not asking you to change your mind today. Just pointing out a few things to look into in case you haven’t.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Oh no, not our out of control population growth fueled by resources running out as I type this comment and causing unspeakable damage to the biosphere of the planet.

    Whatever will we do if our numbers fall below 7 billion.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I don’t disagree, but the systems necessary to make this happen non-destructively just do not exist.

      BTW, you may like the limits to growth study. https://archive.org/details/TheLimitsToGrowth

      Although it is kind of a downer. In the 70s, they predicted the downfall of society. We’re on track with the prediction, more or less.