• LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      119
      ·
      1 个月前

      Well, yes. This is going to be one grift after another, with nazi stuff thrown in.

    • neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      1 个月前

      I believe so, but they’re going to use the public tweet to argue that the tip was public. “It’s not insider trading if it’s all out in the open.”

      Mafioso shit.

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        1 个月前

        That’s honestly an interesting strategy. Trump is immune from the law so he can signal to his cronies using public social media posts and everyone walks away scott free

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 个月前

          And the worst case scenario for him is people start reading his drivel to get in on the grift

      • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 个月前

        “It’s not insider trading if it’s all out in the open.”

        It’s market manipulation. Still a crime, though we all know nothing will be done about it.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 个月前

      Insider trading is not illegal per se. It comes with various restrictions depending on who you are but they don’t apply to everybody.

      This is just corrupt as shit, which is seemingly perfectly allowable.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 个月前

      Insider trading is where the one doing the trade has insider information. This “tweet” (“Truth”?) cannot be insider information by definition.

      Could Trump administration figures do insider trading on the basis of more explicit insider information? Absolutely. Does this message prove any of that? No.

      • meyotch@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 个月前

        Correct, not insider trading, just an egregious abuse of power justifying his removal from office.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 个月前

      Plausible deniability - there was a public recommendation by a stable genius. Maybe people read his media site and follow his recommendations. Stranger things are happening every day

      And orangeboi made himself above the law