A fifth of female climate scientists who responded to Guardian survey said they had opted to have no or fewer children

Ihad the hormonal urges,” said Prof Camille Parmesan, a leading climate scientist based in France. “Oh my gosh, it was very strong. But it was: ‘Do I really want to bring a child into this world that we’re creating?’ Even 30 years ago, it was very clear the world was going to hell in a handbasket. I’m 62 now and I’m actually really glad I did not have children.”

Parmesan is not alone. An exclusive Guardian survey has found that almost a fifth of the female climate experts who responded have chosen to have no children, or fewer children, due to the environmental crises afflicting the world.

An Indian scientist who chose to be anonymous decided to adopt rather than have children of her own. “There are too many children in India who do not get a fair chance and we can offer that to someone who is already born,” she said. “We are not so special that our genes need to be transmitted: values matter more.

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    97
    ·
    6 months ago

    What if your kid was going to be the one to fix everything though? Lol now we are doomed

    • mutant_zz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      116
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      We’re not in a movie. Climate change isn’t going be solved by one brilliant scientist. It’s not even a scientific/technology problem at this point, it’s a political one.

      • 3volver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        You nailed it with this comment, I agree completely. We have the technology, we’ve HAD the technology to solve the problem, and we’ve KNOWN what the problem is for a long time now. We have GREEDY fucks in high positions of power who wouldn’t make any money solving it though, that’s the problem.

      • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        If it is solved it will definitely be through technology of some sort. While I agree it will not be one brilliant scientist, technology will be the solution.

        That technology may come in the form of a way to produce more energy without fucking up the climate, and the engineering and logistical capacity to roll out the change at a breakneck pace.

        It may come in the form of simply developing a way to control the global climate directly.

        It might come in the form of some technology to control the behavior of humans so that we can actually respond appropriately.

        Or it might come in the form of the singularity, when self improving machines grow so far beyond us so fast that they can just do what is needed whether we like it or not.

        But one way or another I guarantee that if it’s solved, it’ll largely be a technological solution, because getting humanity to just…stop using energy at our current rate…is just not going to happen.

        • moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          The issue with technosolutionism is that it can’t fit the necessary parameters to address climate change. We already know we can’t go further with infinite growth. It’s not possible to tackle climate change. We need degrowth. Without it, it’s impossible.

          The problem is that our economy is based on growth, and this growth will generate the new tech. If you’re for state developed and owned technologies, you have to change the political dogma et system first.

          Addressing the climate crisis is a change in the politic and in the economic system. Without both of them, it will continue.

      • Wolfy21_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Cool, now you, an educated, well intent person with good morals won’t have any offspring to pass those values to, and thus won’t have any representation in the next generations. Meanwhile redneck Terry will make 7 children with 3 different women and teach them to hate the libruls and that the earth is flat.

        It is your decision not to have kids, I chose so myself too. But your line of thinking is in discord with the argument.

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Have you met the kids of those rednecks? A lot are estranged from their parents.

          Especially with the internet, parents have a limited amount of control over kids, the more important part is education.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            the more important part is education.

            And that’s why there’s growing far-right movements around the world (especially the Western world) who want to defund education!

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        …. And all we needed was that brilliant orator, the Great Persuader on the side of good, someone to rally around to save the world!

        • Specal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          They just get called woke gay snowflakes then the accusers go eat 10 steaks and jack off.

          Theres no way to fix this with kind words, only through force

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I would have done it, but when i looked around, looked to the future, and realized people had been horrible to me overall, i declined.

      • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Maybe it is going to be solved by a brilliant political activist or leader. Jokes aside, of course it won’t be a couple of people who will magically solve something. Strong leaders will however ease the cause by promoting issues best.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Political problems can be addressed through science and technology. Like the firearm, or the bicycle, or bittorrent. We need a way to coordinate a defense that won’t simply be shut down.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        Everything is a science problem. Big refrigerators. Really big. Cool the whole world. Store heat in barrels and shoot them into the sun. Time machines. A whole host of solutions!

        • Lesrid@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yes if your solution is to throw literal children at the problem you should quit while you’re ahead.

          • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            If the problem remains, you still haven’t thrown enough children at it.*

            *) As a parent of wonderful kids /s of course.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Lmao…

          Your two ideas are…

          1. “Someone’s child will solve the problem”
          2. Well there’s nothing we can do

          ?

          • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            No my ideas are that I’ll live my life and be the best person I can.

            It was a joke when I said his kid could fix it. That guy’s obviously an idiot and his kids would be too

            How do you people not know sarcasm? So I need to dumb it down for you with the /s like back in the day on Reddit? I thought we moved past that

            • otp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yes, it’s obvious that you were joking about the other commenter’s kid fixing the problem.

              The issue is that it embodies the sentiment that it’s “not our problem” and it’s for the future generation to figure out…and then when that was called out, the first alternative you brought up was defeatism, as if that’s the only alternative to someone in the future fixing the problem, lol

              • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                The defeatism was obviously sarcasm too though. So stop making all these assumptions about me.

                I obviously want the issues fixed and have hope that they will be since I said that I have my own children. I do my fair share as well.

                Also you talk about “defeatism” and that’s all I see in this thread. People give up on the chance to have kids not because they don’t want them but because some rich assholes have started to destroy the environment, things cost too much, the pay isn’t right, etc… that’s defeatism. The rich assholes are still having plenty of kids and they will be the ones to inherit the world.

    • SolarMech@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      We don’t have time to wait for kids to grow up before doing what we can. Ah, sorry. Before putting all of that responsibility on them and screaming “NOT IT!”

    • Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Wow, bunch of twats not understanding a joke

      Edit: about; it was not a joke, I repeat it was not a joke. Torpedo it

      • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        6 months ago

        People are just so down on the world they want to crush all hope and joy for others too. In the long run I think people will be fine. The other planet’s residents probably not so much. But people will adapt. I’d rather experience life than worry too much about what I can’t solve.

        I have kids too and seeing them experience joy and happiness is super rewarding. All you worry warts are just going to miss out.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          People in developed countries will be fine. As long as you’re narcissistic enough to only look close by, we’re good to go!

          Seriously though, definitely not my line of thinking and I’m very happy I had kids. There are many problems in the world and climate is just one of them. De-population of developed countries is another: we’ve started a population bomb that on 50 years will destabilize society as developed countries suddenly shrink. People are not only the cause of most of the worlds problems, they’re also the solution

          Anyway, having kids is a personal choice, regardless of the world careening from one potential catastrophe to the next.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The other planet’s residents probably not so much.

          Which other planet? Lol

          Is there some plan to invade an alien world? Maybe that’ll be our solution, huh?