Hilarious, when will they learn you cannot sell a game that gamers do not want to play.

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I always feel bad for the devs with these situations. I’m sure there’s so much art and effort put into this game even if it sucked, and those people who made it now don’t even get to show it off in action. Even if the final result sucked, it still sucks for those people who worked hard on elements of it.

    • SuperSleuth@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      I couldn’t imagine putting 8 years of effort into a game only for it to bomb. But a least they got their paychecks.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 months ago

        There is a good chance if it is a badly managed project by the time it launches everyone working on it already resents the project anyway and will be glad that it is over.

    • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      And then there was a developer calling gamers talentless freaks for not enjoying the game so hard to sympathise with everyone.

    • Renacles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Reception for the game is not even that bad, it was just handled so poorly that nobody wanted to play it.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        I wonder how much of the problem is from people simply not knowing about it. It’s always fascinating when I first hear about things when they are cancelled.

        • Renacles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          That horrible trailer from gamescon was the first I heard of it. How did a 100M game from Sony have such bad marketing?

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Technically they still have it in their portfolio when they apply to their next, likely more lucrative job. 3D artists, illustrators, animators, etc, can use assets in highlight reels (usually, especially after NDA is cleared after release).

      Also AAA titles are a collaborative effort. While it’ll suck to see it panned, knowing you are just the guy who made the hands or something softens that blow.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        If I worked on Concord, I probably wouldn’t want to put whatever I did on it in my portfolio. Id just leave that one off and instead take whatever work I mighr have done, redesign it to be actually appealing, and then include that instead.

    • tuckerm@supermeter.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Same. And especially for a live service game, it’s just gone. If someone made some great 3D models and animations for an offline game, even if the game doesn’t sell very well, their work is still out there. But with a live service game, that’s just it. No one else gets to see it for more than a few days.

      I also hate the fact that the dev studio will face the consequences of this, while whatever braindead exec with a master’s in bullshit administration will probably still be employed.

      But at the same time… I can’t help but enjoy the spectacular failures of these anti-consumer products lately.