Due to an oversight, Trump’s attorneys failed to ask for a jury trial within the time allotted to them

  • krayj@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    So the repeated (ad nauseum) Trump claim “I only hire the best people” isn’t accurate?

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s absolutely accurate, we just never asked by what metric “best” was being measured.

      “Best” in this case was apparently “someone dumb enough to think Trump won’t screw them out of money.” :P

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, I must have followed a link to one of their videos at some point, because the YouTube algorithm spammed me their shit for months until I blocked it.

        What kind of content is it? The thumbnails and titles looked rage baity

        • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s actually pretty decent legal oriented YouTube entertainment. He’s a practicing lawyer that talks about current events and discusses possibly relevant laws or sometimes legal procedures. Sort of a more serious version of attorney tom.

        • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s pretty good. He definitely has a bias and I don’t agree with him 100% of the time.

          For example, he advocates that forced arbitration agreements isn’t that bad. I don’t agree with that at all.

          But it’s good content and high quality.

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Trump could hire the best lawyers money could buy, he would.

      Problem is he is either stiffed his previous lawyers, so the smart ones don’t trust him.

      Or those lawyers are now witnesses in his legal battles. So they can’t represent him.

      • orbitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah when your lawyers have to record you (believe it’s something from Cohen’s testimony) to have a backup of what you requested, you don’t get the best lawyers. Trump would never hire someone that seems smarter them himself, he has to be the most intelligent person in the room (lol). No one intelligent would really act dumb enough to be hired by someone who is notorious for not paying, mean unless there’s other factors but he’s not getting a highly regarded and clean lawyer at this point.

        • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Anyone else have fun thinking about how fictional lawyers would represent Trump?

          Like I could see someone like Lionel Hutz representing Trump. Maybe Barry Zuckercorn.

          Not Bob Loblaw. I think Saul Goodman might pass on him. Kim Wexler I could see doing it probono.

  • captsneeze@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m just some idiot on the internet who doesn’t know what I’m talking about, but…

    Is it possible this isn’t a mistake? If you’re going to try to win a trial through corruption and wrongdoings, it seems easier to illicitly win over (and have it stay quiet) one person than half of a jury, no?

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s their play, they don’t want a jury because they’re trying to pay the groundwork for a mistrial via judicial bias but that is a high jump and they’re stumbling on molehills.

        • Googlyman64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The jury has to be unanimous no matter the decision. If they can’t agree, they either deliberate as long as it takes, or if the jury is hung, then they’ll reduce the charges.

  • mateomaui@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I posted this story in politics from another source a few days ago and it was removed because apparently the source wasn’t good enough and people couldn’t find it anywhere else. It was the only source reporting it at the time, but ok then.

    edit: guess it was farther back than I remember, here’s that article from ~3 weeks ago

    https://washingtonpress.com/2023/09/12/attorney-error-trump-eschews-jury-in-manhattan-case/

    edit2: yep, 19 days ago

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good. Let’s hope that this is just the first of stupidities he stumbles over. Didn’t he already piss off the judge that presides over this case?